INTEGRATING AI METHODOLOGIES IN FORECASTING MODELS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE PREDICTIONS

Background: The bringing in of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the climate change forecasting models would help in producing more accurate forecast results and better the measures that are taken for mitigating it. However, the use of AI in this field has failed to meet certain technical and systemic barriers. Objective: The objectives of this research will be to ascertain quantitatively the level of preparedness of the professionals towards the use of AI in deriving climate change forecasts, the level of resistance that professionals will exhibit in incorporating AI into their modeling, and how willing they are to use it in the same process. Methods: An online and self-completion survey with a structured format was administered to 250 respondents of the four target populations of ML/AI users, climate scientists, and environmental policymakers. To analyze the data, basic descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were applied: Lilliefor tests to check for normal distribution, Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of reliability, correlation, and regression analysis to check the relation between AI familiarity & confidence levels. Results: The analysis of the data unveiled rather considerable fluctuations in the perceived efficiency of AI with the help of the Lilliefors test that pointed to the non-normality of the distribution. Cronbach’s alpha of 0. The reliability analysis of the AI-indexed perception questions showed low internal consistency in 046. Hypothesis three was not supported as statistical test results revealed that there is no medium to perfect positive correlation between the degrees of familiarity with AI on the one hand and confidence in the effectiveness of the same on the other hand. Some of the challenges to the integration of AI revealed from the survey include high costs and lack of support from the government, however many of the respondents indicated interest in adopting AI for sustainability initiatives. Conclusion: The study also shows that despite the entice for the use of AI in climate change predictions, there a challenges such as lack of funds and poor support from institutions in its application. Furthermore, raising the awareness of AI alone implies that people’s confidence in the impact of this technique will not necessarily rise either. Combating all these barriers through financial investments, policy support, and well-documented AI applications might lead to better implementation of AI in climate science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62019/dwn2a492
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTEGRATING AI METHODOLOGIES IN FORECASTING MODELS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE PREDICTIONS

Noraida Haji Ali, Abu Bakkar, Talha Abaid
Journal of medical & health sciences review.
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

INTEGRATING AI METHODOLOGIES IN FORECASTING MODELS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE PREDICTIONS

Noraida Haji Ali, Abu Bakkar, Talha Abaid
article en

Abstract

Background: The bringing in of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the climate change forecasting models would help in producing more accurate forecast results and better the measures that are taken for mitigating it. However, the use of AI in this field has failed to meet certain technical and systemic barriers. Objective: The objectives of this research will be to ascertain quantitatively the level of preparedness of the professionals towards the use of AI in deriving climate change forecasts, the level of resistance that professionals will exhibit in incorporating AI into their modeling, and how willing they are to use it in the same process. Methods: An online and self-completion survey with a structured format was administered to 250 respondents of the four target populations of ML/AI users, climate scientists, and environmental policymakers. To analyze the data, basic descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were applied: Lilliefor tests to check for normal distribution, Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of reliability, correlation, and regression analysis to check the relation between AI familiarity & confidence levels. Results: The analysis of the data unveiled rather considerable fluctuations in the perceived efficiency of AI with the help of the Lilliefors test that pointed to the non-normality of the distribution. Cronbach’s alpha of 0. The reliability analysis of the AI-indexed perception questions showed low internal consistency in 046. Hypothesis three was not supported as statistical test results revealed that there is no medium to perfect positive correlation between the degrees of familiarity with AI on the one hand and confidence in the effectiveness of the same on the other hand. Some of the challenges to the integration of AI revealed from the survey include high costs and lack of support from the government, however many of the respondents indicated interest in adopting AI for sustainability initiatives. Conclusion: The study also shows that despite the entice for the use of AI in climate change predictions, there a challenges such as lack of funds and poor support from institutions in its application. Furthermore, raising the awareness of AI alone implies that people’s confidence in the impact of this technique will not necessarily rise either. Combating all these barriers through financial investments, policy support, and well-documented AI applications might lead to better implementation of AI in climate science.

Journal of medical & health sciences review.Vol. 1(1)
Our Lady of Fatima Hospital (US), University of Peshawar (PK), University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.