A Ge.F.I. Collaborative Study: Evaluating Reproducibility and Accuracy of a DNA‐Methylation‐Based Age‐Predictive Assay for Routine Implementation in Forensic Casework

The increasing interest in DNA methylation (DNAm) analysis within the forensic scientific community prompted a collaborative project by Ge.F.I. (Genetisti Forensi Italiani). The study evaluated a standardized bisulfite conversion-based Single Base Extension (SBE) protocol for the analysis of the methylation levels at five age-predictive loci (ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59). The study encompassed three phases: (1) setting up and validating the protocol to ensure consistency and reproducibility; (2) comparing fresh peripheral blood with blood spots; and (3) evaluating sources of intra- and inter-laboratory variability. Samples from 22 Italian volunteers were analyzed by 6 laboratories in replicates for a total of 528 records. From phase I emerged that the choice of genetic sequencer significantly contributed to inter-laboratory data variation, resulting in separate regression analyses performed for each laboratory. In phase II, blood spots were found to be a reliable source for DNAm analysis, despite exhibiting increased experimental variation compared to fresh peripheral blood. In phase III, a strong correlation between the individual's predicted and true ages was observed across different laboratories. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the residuals indicated that one-third of the total variance could be attributed to laboratory-specific factors, whereas two-thirds could be attributed to inter-individual biological differences. The leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) method yielded an overall mean absolute deviation (MAD) value of 4.41 years, with an average 95% confidence interval of 5.24 years. Stepwise regression analysis proved that a restricted model (ELOVL2, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59) produced results virtually indistinguishable from the five-loci model. Additionally, the analysis of samples in replicates greatly improved the fit of the regression model, balancing the slight effects of intra-laboratory variability. In conclusion, the bisulfite conversion-based SBE protocol, combined with replicate analysis and in-lab calibration of a regression-prediction model, proves to be a reliable and easily implementable method for age prediction in forensic laboratories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electrophoresis
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202400190
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Ge.F.I. Collaborative Study: Evaluating Reproducibility and Accuracy of a DNA‐Methylation‐Based Age‐Predictive Assay for Routine Implementation in Forensic Casework

Silvano Presciuttini, E. Carnevali, Martina Onofri, Federica Alessandrini et al.
2 citations
Electrophoresis
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
1.61
article

A Ge.F.I. Collaborative Study: Evaluating Reproducibility and Accuracy of a DNA‐Methylation‐Based Age‐Predictive Assay for Routine Implementation in Forensic Casework

Silvano Presciuttini, E. Carnevali, Martina Onofri, Federica Alessandrini, Serena Aneli, Fabiano Gentile, M. Fabbri, Simona Severini, Pamela Tozzo, Federica Tommolini, Andrea Verzeletti, Paolo Garofano, Carlo Robino, Elena Chierto, Paolo Fattorini, Carlo Previderé, Loredana Buscemi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The increasing interest in DNA methylation (DNAm) analysis within the forensic scientific community prompted a collaborative project by Ge.F.I. (Genetisti Forensi Italiani). The study evaluated a standardized bisulfite conversion-based Single Base Extension (SBE) protocol for the analysis of the methylation levels at five age-predictive loci (ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59). The study encompassed three phases: (1) setting up and validating the protocol to ensure consistency and reproducibility; (2) comparing fresh peripheral blood with blood spots; and (3) evaluating sources of intra- and inter-laboratory variability. Samples from 22 Italian volunteers were analyzed by 6 laboratories in replicates for a total of 528 records. From phase I emerged that the choice of genetic sequencer significantly contributed to inter-laboratory data variation, resulting in separate regression analyses performed for each laboratory. In phase II, blood spots were found to be a reliable source for DNAm analysis, despite exhibiting increased experimental variation compared to fresh peripheral blood. In phase III, a strong correlation between the individual's predicted and true ages was observed across different laboratories. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the residuals indicated that one-third of the total variance could be attributed to laboratory-specific factors, whereas two-thirds could be attributed to inter-individual biological differences. The leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV) method yielded an overall mean absolute deviation (MAD) value of 4.41 years, with an average 95% confidence interval of 5.24 years. Stepwise regression analysis proved that a restricted model (ELOVL2, C1orf132/MIR29B2C, and TRIM59) produced results virtually indistinguishable from the five-loci model. Additionally, the analysis of samples in replicates greatly improved the fit of the regression model, balancing the slight effects of intra-laboratory variability. In conclusion, the bisulfite conversion-based SBE protocol, combined with replicate analysis and in-lab calibration of a regression-prediction model, proves to be a reliable and easily implementable method for age prediction in forensic laboratories.

ElectrophoresisVol. 46(1-2)
University of Pisa (IT), Marche Polytechnic University (IT), University of Padua (IT), University of Trieste (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), University of Pavia (IT), University of Perugia (IT), University of Turin (IT), University of Brescia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.