Coating Agents for Resin Composites: Effect on Color Stability, Roughness, and Surface Micromorphology Subjected to Brushing Wear

This study evaluated the influence of six resin composite coating agents on color stability and surface roughness after toothbrushing abrasion. Discs (Ø6 mm x 2 mm) of nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Z350XT) were prepared for application of coating agents (n=10): control (absence), two surface sealants (PermaSeal and BisCover LV), two adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive/3M Oral Care and Single Bond Universal), and two modeling liquids (Modeling Resin and Composite Wetting Resin). CIELab*, WID, and color change (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) were analyzed at baseline, after finishing and polishing, after application of coating agents, after coffee staining (simulating 30 days and one year of staining), and after toothbrushing abrasion. Roughness evaluations (Ra) were performed at the initial time point, after finishing and polishing, after application of coating agents, and after toothbrushing abrasion. Surface micromorphology was evaluated (2,000×) before and after toothbrushing abrasion. Generalized linear mixed models or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α=0.05) showed that L* decreased significantly (p<0.0001) and a* increased significantly in all the groups after staining (p<0.0001). After toothbrushing, Modeling Resin showed higher ΔEab and ΔE00 than the control, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive, Composite Wetting Resin, PermaSeal, or BisCover LV (p<0.0001). There was a significant increase in roughness for Composite Wetting Resin, Modeling Resin, and PermaSeal after application of the agents (p<0.05), but a significant decrease for BisCover LV (p<0.05), which achieved high surface smoothness. After abrasive wear, BisCover LV showed the lowest roughness values among all agents. Composite Wetting Resin and Modeling Resin showed higher roughness than the other groups (p<0.05), and surface irregularities. In conclusion, the coating agents did not prevent coffee staining, and they also led to increased surface roughness, with only BisCover LV providing greater surface smoothness after toothbrush abrasion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Operative Dentistry
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2341/24-069-l
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coating Agents for Resin Composites: Effect on Color Stability, Roughness, and Surface Micromorphology Subjected to Brushing Wear

Tamires da Silva Martins, Waldemir Francisco Vieira-Júnior, Roberta Tarkany Basting, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França et al.
1 citations
Operative Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Coating Agents for Resin Composites: Effect on Color Stability, Roughness, and Surface Micromorphology Subjected to Brushing Wear

Tamires da Silva Martins, Waldemir Francisco Vieira-Júnior, Roberta Tarkany Basting, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França, CP Turssi, FR Hojo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of six resin composite coating agents on color stability and surface roughness after toothbrushing abrasion. Discs (Ø6 mm x 2 mm) of nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Z350XT) were prepared for application of coating agents (n=10): control (absence), two surface sealants (PermaSeal and BisCover LV), two adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive/3M Oral Care and Single Bond Universal), and two modeling liquids (Modeling Resin and Composite Wetting Resin). CIELab*, WID, and color change (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) were analyzed at baseline, after finishing and polishing, after application of coating agents, after coffee staining (simulating 30 days and one year of staining), and after toothbrushing abrasion. Roughness evaluations (Ra) were performed at the initial time point, after finishing and polishing, after application of coating agents, and after toothbrushing abrasion. Surface micromorphology was evaluated (2,000×) before and after toothbrushing abrasion. Generalized linear mixed models or Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (α=0.05) showed that L* decreased significantly (p<0.0001) and a* increased significantly in all the groups after staining (p<0.0001). After toothbrushing, Modeling Resin showed higher ΔEab and ΔE00 than the control, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive, Composite Wetting Resin, PermaSeal, or BisCover LV (p<0.0001). There was a significant increase in roughness for Composite Wetting Resin, Modeling Resin, and PermaSeal after application of the agents (p<0.05), but a significant decrease for BisCover LV (p<0.05), which achieved high surface smoothness. After abrasive wear, BisCover LV showed the lowest roughness values among all agents. Composite Wetting Resin and Modeling Resin showed higher roughness than the other groups (p<0.05), and surface irregularities. In conclusion, the coating agents did not prevent coffee staining, and they also led to increased surface roughness, with only BisCover LV providing greater surface smoothness after toothbrush abrasion.

Operative DentistryVol. 50(1)
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.