The Intersection of Technology and Tradition: A Comparative Analysis of AI and Live Anchors in Verbal Expression

This paper explores the differences in verbal expression between AI anchors and real-life anchors. Case studies and comparative methods are used to analyse the use of external and internal techniques between live and AI anchors. AI anchors demonstrate a high level of technical processing skills, such as the correct use of pauses and accents, but fall short in emotional resonance and personalised expression. Real-life anchors, with their ability to interact and adapt emotionally, show strengths in more complex situational repertoires and deeper linguistic expressions. In addition, by comparing the differences in linguistic aesthetics between AI anchors and real-life anchors, the irreplaceable nature of unique human aesthetic ability and emotional expression is further emphasised. Despite the progress made by AI technology in simulating human speech and emotions, real-life anchors demonstrate a higher level of artistic aesthetics in terms of deep understanding and emotional resonance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Art and Architecture
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56397/saa.2024.12.05
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Intersection of Technology and Tradition: A Comparative Analysis of AI and Live Anchors in Verbal Expression

Yamei Niu
1 citations
Studies in Art and Architecture
Action Observation and Synchronization
0.64
article

The Intersection of Technology and Tradition: A Comparative Analysis of AI and Live Anchors in Verbal Expression

Yamei Niu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the differences in verbal expression between AI anchors and real-life anchors. Case studies and comparative methods are used to analyse the use of external and internal techniques between live and AI anchors. AI anchors demonstrate a high level of technical processing skills, such as the correct use of pauses and accents, but fall short in emotional resonance and personalised expression. Real-life anchors, with their ability to interact and adapt emotionally, show strengths in more complex situational repertoires and deeper linguistic expressions. In addition, by comparing the differences in linguistic aesthetics between AI anchors and real-life anchors, the irreplaceable nature of unique human aesthetic ability and emotional expression is further emphasised. Despite the progress made by AI technology in simulating human speech and emotions, real-life anchors demonstrate a higher level of artistic aesthetics in terms of deep understanding and emotional resonance.

Studies in Art and ArchitectureVol. 3(4)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Action Observation and Synchronization
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.