Analisis Strategi Linguistik Richard Eliezer: Penggunaan Frasa "Tidak Tahu" dan "Saya Rasa" di Pengadilan.

Language serves as a strategic tool for managing legal and emotional pressures during trials. This study focuses on the use of the phrases "tidak tahu" and "saya rasa" in Richard Eliezer's testimony in the Brigadier J case, reflecting defensive communication strategies. The issues examined are how these phrases are used to evade legal responsibility and how emotional pressure influences speech patterns. Using a descriptive quantitative and qualitative approach, the results indicate that the phrase “tidak tahu" (used 41 times) is employed to avoid accountability, while "saya rasa" (used 4 times) reflects subjective opinions aimed at risk mitigation. These findings reveal a close relationship between the emotional pressure experienced by the witness and their language choices, as well as the importance of linguistic analysis in understanding legal communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v5i4.3506
Primary Topic
Linguistics and Language Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Strategi Linguistik Richard Eliezer: Penggunaan Frasa "Tidak Tahu" dan "Saya Rasa" di Pengadilan.

Prihantoro Prihantoro, Miftahulkhairah Anwar, Jefriyanto Saud
JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION
Linguistics and Language Analysis
article

Analisis Strategi Linguistik Richard Eliezer: Penggunaan Frasa "Tidak Tahu" dan "Saya Rasa" di Pengadilan.

Prihantoro Prihantoro, Miftahulkhairah Anwar, Jefriyanto Saud
article en

Abstract

Language serves as a strategic tool for managing legal and emotional pressures during trials. This study focuses on the use of the phrases "tidak tahu" and "saya rasa" in Richard Eliezer's testimony in the Brigadier J case, reflecting defensive communication strategies. The issues examined are how these phrases are used to evade legal responsibility and how emotional pressure influences speech patterns. Using a descriptive quantitative and qualitative approach, the results indicate that the phrase “tidak tahu" (used 41 times) is employed to avoid accountability, while "saya rasa" (used 4 times) reflects subjective opinions aimed at risk mitigation. These findings reveal a close relationship between the emotional pressure experienced by the witness and their language choices, as well as the importance of linguistic analysis in understanding legal communication.

JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATIONVol. 5(4)
Diponegoro University (ID), State University of Jakarta (ID), State University of Gorontalo (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Linguistics and Language Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.