Evaluating L2 Training Methods in Neural Language Models

Recent advancements in language models (LMs) have significantly improved language processing capabilities; however, these models remain less efficient than human learning, especially when trained on developmentally plausible data volumes similar to those encountered by children (Warstadt & Bowman, 2022; Linzen, 2020). The inefficiency is even more pronounced in second language (L2) acquisition contexts, where cross-linguistic transfer is a key phenomenon (Papadimitriou & Jurafsky, 2020; Yadavalli et al., 2023). This study evaluates L2 training methods in neural language models by examining mutual L1-L2 influences during learning with developmentally plausible data volumes. We propose two approaches to mitigate catastrophic forgetting: the One-Stage Training (OST) method, which integrates L1 and L2 learning into a single stage, and the One-Stage Mixed Training (OSMT) method, which refines OST by incorporating L1 data into the L2 stage for more realistic simulation of bilingual learning. Through continuous syntactic evaluations throughout training, we analyzed how L1 performance changes during L2 acquisition and how cross-linguistics transfer emerges in Korean and English. The results indicate that OST and OSMT effectively mitigated catastrophic forgetting and supported more stable learning compared to the conventional Two-Stage Training method. OSMT achieved superior integration of L1 and L2 structures while revealing negative transfer effects from Korean (L1) to English (L2). These findings provide valuable insights into both neural model training and human-like L2 acquisition processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lanaguage Research
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2024.60.3.323
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating L2 Training Methods in Neural Language Models

Jaemin Lee, Jeong‐Ah Shin
Lanaguage Research
Topic Modeling
article

Evaluating L2 Training Methods in Neural Language Models

Jaemin Lee, Jeong‐Ah Shin
article en

Abstract

Recent advancements in language models (LMs) have significantly improved language processing capabilities; however, these models remain less efficient than human learning, especially when trained on developmentally plausible data volumes similar to those encountered by children (Warstadt & Bowman, 2022; Linzen, 2020). The inefficiency is even more pronounced in second language (L2) acquisition contexts, where cross-linguistic transfer is a key phenomenon (Papadimitriou & Jurafsky, 2020; Yadavalli et al., 2023). This study evaluates L2 training methods in neural language models by examining mutual L1-L2 influences during learning with developmentally plausible data volumes. We propose two approaches to mitigate catastrophic forgetting: the One-Stage Training (OST) method, which integrates L1 and L2 learning into a single stage, and the One-Stage Mixed Training (OSMT) method, which refines OST by incorporating L1 data into the L2 stage for more realistic simulation of bilingual learning. Through continuous syntactic evaluations throughout training, we analyzed how L1 performance changes during L2 acquisition and how cross-linguistics transfer emerges in Korean and English. The results indicate that OST and OSMT effectively mitigated catastrophic forgetting and supported more stable learning compared to the conventional Two-Stage Training method. OSMT achieved superior integration of L1 and L2 structures while revealing negative transfer effects from Korean (L1) to English (L2). These findings provide valuable insights into both neural model training and human-like L2 acquisition processes.

Lanaguage ResearchVol. 60(3)
Dongguk University (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.