Differences in the Organization and Operation of Student-Selected Curriculum in High School Credit System by Region and School Size

This study empirically analyzes the differences in organizing and operating student-centered curricula in high school credit systems based on region and school size. A survey of 68 designated high schools examined the status of curricula and the perceptions of school members. Results indicate that rural areas and smaller schools offer fewer elective credits and subjects, with low operational rates for non-national curriculum subjects and joint curricula. Conversely, larger cities and schools have seen an increase in elective credits, though some still offer fewer than medium and small cities. Parental satisfaction with subjects was higher in rural and smaller schools. Additionally, the effectiveness of non-national curriculum subjects and joint curricula was viewed as enhancing students’ choices and reducing disparities in rural areas, while in larger settings, it was seen as promoting student interests and differentiated instruction. The study concludes that support needs to vary by region and school size, and suggests tailored strategies to address disparities in curriculum organization and operation.