AI solutionism as a barrier to sustainability transformations in research and innovation

AI-driven approaches dominate research and innovation, but are they addressing social complexities and deeper ethical challenges? Following a critique of the growing reliance on technical solutions to sustainability issues, the author calls for a shift toward value pluralism and epistemic humility, offering reforms to reshape research and higher education priorities.In this article, the impact of AI-driven solutionism in research and innovation is critically examined, with a particular focus on sustainability challenges. It is argued that overreliance on technical solutions often ignores ethical complexities, leading to two risks: overlooking diverse values and epistemic hubris. The author examines how current trends in academia, research funding, and industry partnerships perpetuate a solutionist ideology, potentially marginalizing critical ethical discourse and participatory decision-making. He highlights the need for a shift towards value pluralism and epistemic humility in research and innovation. He concludes by proposing reforms in higher education and research funding to foster these principles, offering concrete examples of their implementation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.33.4.8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI solutionism as a barrier to sustainability transformations in research and innovation

Andrei Nutas
1 citations
GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society
Digital Transformation in Industry
0.35
article

AI solutionism as a barrier to sustainability transformations in research and innovation

Andrei Nutas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AI-driven approaches dominate research and innovation, but are they addressing social complexities and deeper ethical challenges? Following a critique of the growing reliance on technical solutions to sustainability issues, the author calls for a shift toward value pluralism and epistemic humility, offering reforms to reshape research and higher education priorities.In this article, the impact of AI-driven solutionism in research and innovation is critically examined, with a particular focus on sustainability challenges. It is argued that overreliance on technical solutions often ignores ethical complexities, leading to two risks: overlooking diverse values and epistemic hubris. The author examines how current trends in academia, research funding, and industry partnerships perpetuate a solutionist ideology, potentially marginalizing critical ethical discourse and participatory decision-making. He highlights the need for a shift towards value pluralism and epistemic humility in research and innovation. He concludes by proposing reforms in higher education and research funding to foster these principles, offering concrete examples of their implementation.

GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and SocietyVol. 33(4)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Digital Transformation in Industry
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.