Who Is Queer Enough for Queer Research?: The Issue of Absence Within Queer Research

ABSTRACT Although the inclusion of queer people in research—as well as the application of queer research methods and methodologies that some call queer research—has been on the rise, too often, certain voices are not heard. Not all groups of people who fall under the umbrella term of “queer” are included in queer research. By looking at the examples of asexuality and queer Muslims in this paper, we offer some insights on how people in these groups are often absent in queer research and how cis‐heteronormativity alongside compulsory sexuality, allonormativity, homonationalism and homocapitalism operates within queer communities and queer research, with exclusion often being the result. Through the utilization of intersectional feminism, transnational feminism, and queer of color critique as our methodological approach, we show how these experiences stand exemplary for the absence of some queer communities from queer research. Furthermore, such a methodological approach can assist us to understand the role of cis‐heteronormativity in queer research and what we can do to become more inclusive when undertaking queer research projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity & Inclusion Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/dvr2.70012
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Is Queer Enough for Queer Research?: The Issue of Absence Within Queer Research

Dominik Drabent, M. Wenzel
1 citations
Diversity & Inclusion Research
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
article

Who Is Queer Enough for Queer Research?: The Issue of Absence Within Queer Research

Dominik Drabent, M. Wenzel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although the inclusion of queer people in research—as well as the application of queer research methods and methodologies that some call queer research—has been on the rise, too often, certain voices are not heard. Not all groups of people who fall under the umbrella term of “queer” are included in queer research. By looking at the examples of asexuality and queer Muslims in this paper, we offer some insights on how people in these groups are often absent in queer research and how cis‐heteronormativity alongside compulsory sexuality, allonormativity, homonationalism and homocapitalism operates within queer communities and queer research, with exclusion often being the result. Through the utilization of intersectional feminism, transnational feminism, and queer of color critique as our methodological approach, we show how these experiences stand exemplary for the absence of some queer communities from queer research. Furthermore, such a methodological approach can assist us to understand the role of cis‐heteronormativity in queer research and what we can do to become more inclusive when undertaking queer research projects.

Diversity & Inclusion ResearchVol. 2(1)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Arizona State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.