Institutional Barriers to Mobility and the University: Policy Issues

This paper addresses the gap between policy objectives for participation in mobility and their implementation in higher education institutions. It examines potential institutional impediments to mobility at the university level. To this end, it adopts a qualitative methodological approach based on semi-structured interviews with administrators involved in implementing the Erasmus programme from a diverse range of Greek universities (purposive sampling). Our findings align with the international literature, which identifies funding, complex bureaucratic procedures, difficulties in recognising study periods, and incomplete or inadequate information about the programme as crucial factors of institutional barriers to mobility. Furthermore, the interviewees' status and geographical origin provided insights into the non-supportive institutional context of participation in mobility. The university does not address student participation inequalities, and the existing institutional framework may discourage students from participating in mobility. Sometimes, this leads to cancelling students' participation in the Erasmus programme, which challenges higher education institutions. Research findings may have practical implications for institutional policies regarding institutional barriers to mobility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futurity Education
Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57125/fed.2024.12.25.12
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional Barriers to Mobility and the University: Policy Issues

Andreas Vasilopoulos
1 citations
Futurity Education
Migration and Labor Dynamics
1.13
article

Institutional Barriers to Mobility and the University: Policy Issues

Andreas Vasilopoulos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper addresses the gap between policy objectives for participation in mobility and their implementation in higher education institutions. It examines potential institutional impediments to mobility at the university level. To this end, it adopts a qualitative methodological approach based on semi-structured interviews with administrators involved in implementing the Erasmus programme from a diverse range of Greek universities (purposive sampling). Our findings align with the international literature, which identifies funding, complex bureaucratic procedures, difficulties in recognising study periods, and incomplete or inadequate information about the programme as crucial factors of institutional barriers to mobility. Furthermore, the interviewees' status and geographical origin provided insights into the non-supportive institutional context of participation in mobility. The university does not address student participation inequalities, and the existing institutional framework may discourage students from participating in mobility. Sometimes, this leads to cancelling students' participation in the Erasmus programme, which challenges higher education institutions. Research findings may have practical implications for institutional policies regarding institutional barriers to mobility.

Futurity EducationVol. 4(4)
University of Patras (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.