An Academic Discourse Analysis of Early Childhood Creativity Education: Focusing on the Period Following the Sixth Kindergarten Curriculum

Objective: This study examines discourses on early childhood creativity education, analyzing academic characteristics and social contexts to discuss its current meaning and future direction. Methods: Using topic analysis, key themes were identified in academic papers published in KCI-listed or candidate journals from 2001 to 2022. The discourse was reinterpreted from an educational policy perspective, considering its social context. Results: The discourse can be grouped into five main categories: “focused on specific domains or programs,” “centered on individual cognitive traits,” “centered on five-year-olds,” “instructor-centered,” and “reflecting educational policies.” These categories reveal how early childhood creativity education discourse is produced and sustained. Conclusions: The discourse is overly concentrated on specific ages, subjects, and effectiveness measures, often following a top-down policy approach. This highlights to the need for a broader, more integrative discourse that includes diverse subjects, areas, and approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Society for Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21197/jcei.15.4.3
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Academic Discourse Analysis of Early Childhood Creativity Education: Focusing on the Period Following the Sixth Kindergarten Curriculum

Hwang Heesook, Anna Han
The Society for Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention
Educational Systems and Policies
article

An Academic Discourse Analysis of Early Childhood Creativity Education: Focusing on the Period Following the Sixth Kindergarten Curriculum

Hwang Heesook, Anna Han
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study examines discourses on early childhood creativity education, analyzing academic characteristics and social contexts to discuss its current meaning and future direction. Methods: Using topic analysis, key themes were identified in academic papers published in KCI-listed or candidate journals from 2001 to 2022. The discourse was reinterpreted from an educational policy perspective, considering its social context. Results: The discourse can be grouped into five main categories: “focused on specific domains or programs,” “centered on individual cognitive traits,” “centered on five-year-olds,” “instructor-centered,” and “reflecting educational policies.” These categories reveal how early childhood creativity education discourse is produced and sustained. Conclusions: The discourse is overly concentrated on specific ages, subjects, and effectiveness measures, often following a top-down policy approach. This highlights to the need for a broader, more integrative discourse that includes diverse subjects, areas, and approaches.

The Society for Cognitive Enhancement and InterventionVol. 15(4)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.