Persepsi Organisasional Politik: Tinjauan Sistematis dan Arah Penelitian Masa Depan

This article aims to systematically review research on Perceptions of Organizational Politics (POP) by addressing gaps in the literature through discussions on scientific contributions and key issues from previous findings related to the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of POP. This study analyzes 17 publications found in the Scopus database, published between 2016 and 2023. The findings reveal that POP is a complex concept with diverse definitions and dimensions, influenced by various organizational and individual factors that significantly affect organizational outcomes. This review highlights that, although limited to publications from a single database, the article provides valuable recommendations for future research to explore POP more broadly using other databases. It also offers a critical systematization of the limited but significant POP literature, providing valuable insights for academics and practitioners to deepen their understanding of this concept. Furthermore, the article opens opportunities for further research to address the limitations of empirical testing related to POP, including its antecedents, consequences, theories, and methodologies. Thus, this article not only enriches the POP literature but also provides direction for future research and practical development. Keywords: Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Systematic Literature Review

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jejaring Administrasi Publik
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20473/jap.v16i2.53905
Primary Topic
Employee Performance and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persepsi Organisasional Politik: Tinjauan Sistematis dan Arah Penelitian Masa Depan

Tommy Oktavian Basoeki
Jejaring Administrasi Publik
Employee Performance and Management
article

Persepsi Organisasional Politik: Tinjauan Sistematis dan Arah Penelitian Masa Depan

Tommy Oktavian Basoeki
article en

Abstract

This article aims to systematically review research on Perceptions of Organizational Politics (POP) by addressing gaps in the literature through discussions on scientific contributions and key issues from previous findings related to the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of POP. This study analyzes 17 publications found in the Scopus database, published between 2016 and 2023. The findings reveal that POP is a complex concept with diverse definitions and dimensions, influenced by various organizational and individual factors that significantly affect organizational outcomes. This review highlights that, although limited to publications from a single database, the article provides valuable recommendations for future research to explore POP more broadly using other databases. It also offers a critical systematization of the limited but significant POP literature, providing valuable insights for academics and practitioners to deepen their understanding of this concept. Furthermore, the article opens opportunities for further research to address the limitations of empirical testing related to POP, including its antecedents, consequences, theories, and methodologies. Thus, this article not only enriches the POP literature but also provides direction for future research and practical development. Keywords: Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Systematic Literature Review

Jejaring Administrasi PublikVol. 16(2)
Universitas Airlangga (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Employee Performance and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.