Framework of risk evaluation of medical AI systems

Medical technologies using artificial intelligence (AI) systems hold a firm place in real clinical practice as the main providers of important information for making medical decisions in diagnosis and treatment via assisting and auxiliary tools in the process of medical care provision. To obtain valid evidence of quality, effectiveness, and safety, AI software developers conduct clinical trials of these systems in accordance with current regulatory requirements [1], guided by the recommendations of recognized experts in the field of clinical research [2]. Ethical committees have a task to conduct a high-quality ethical review of the planned research, taking into account the specifics of AI technologies used in medicine and risks associated with their use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Медицинская этика
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24075/medet.2024.027
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framework of risk evaluation of medical AI systems

E A Volskaya, И. В. Рогова
Медицинская этика
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

Framework of risk evaluation of medical AI systems

E A Volskaya, И. В. Рогова
article en

Abstract

Medical technologies using artificial intelligence (AI) systems hold a firm place in real clinical practice as the main providers of important information for making medical decisions in diagnosis and treatment via assisting and auxiliary tools in the process of medical care provision. To obtain valid evidence of quality, effectiveness, and safety, AI software developers conduct clinical trials of these systems in accordance with current regulatory requirements [1], guided by the recommendations of recognized experts in the field of clinical research [2]. Ethical committees have a task to conduct a high-quality ethical review of the planned research, taking into account the specifics of AI technologies used in medicine and risks associated with their use.

Медицинская этика(2024(4))
National Research Institute of Public Health named after N.A. Semashko (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.