EVALUASI EFISIENSI BIAYA DAN WAKTU ANTARA METODE KONVENSIONAL DAN PRACETAK DALAM PEKERJAAN DRAINASE U-DITCH DI RUAS JALAN NASIONAL JAMBI

Cost and time efficiency are two crucial aspects that influence the success of a construction project. Conventional methods are usually used because they are considered more flexible and easily adapted to field conditions. However, the precast method is increasingly in demand because it is claimed to be more efficient and faster in implementation. This research uses a case study approach by collecting primary and secondary data from planned work. Cost data is obtained from the detailed cost budget (RAB), while time data is taken from the project implementation schedule (time schedule). The analysis was carried out by comparing the total costs and time duration between conventional and precast methods using the 2018 Bina Marga Specifications. The research results show that the precast method has advantages in time efficiency, with an average construction time that is shorter than conventional methods. However, in terms of costs, precast methods tend to be more expensive in the initial stages due to the high production costs of precast elements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sistem Infrastruktur Teknik Sipil (SIMTEKS)
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32897/simteks.v4i2.3949
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Transport Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUASI EFISIENSI BIAYA DAN WAKTU ANTARA METODE KONVENSIONAL DAN PRACETAK DALAM PEKERJAAN DRAINASE U-DITCH DI RUAS JALAN NASIONAL JAMBI

Bugie Rastapi Iskandar, Dody Kusmana
1 citations
Sistem Infrastruktur Teknik Sipil (SIMTEKS)
Urban Transport Systems Analysis
0.26
article

EVALUASI EFISIENSI BIAYA DAN WAKTU ANTARA METODE KONVENSIONAL DAN PRACETAK DALAM PEKERJAAN DRAINASE U-DITCH DI RUAS JALAN NASIONAL JAMBI

Bugie Rastapi Iskandar, Dody Kusmana
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cost and time efficiency are two crucial aspects that influence the success of a construction project. Conventional methods are usually used because they are considered more flexible and easily adapted to field conditions. However, the precast method is increasingly in demand because it is claimed to be more efficient and faster in implementation. This research uses a case study approach by collecting primary and secondary data from planned work. Cost data is obtained from the detailed cost budget (RAB), while time data is taken from the project implementation schedule (time schedule). The analysis was carried out by comparing the total costs and time duration between conventional and precast methods using the 2018 Bina Marga Specifications. The research results show that the precast method has advantages in time efficiency, with an average construction time that is shorter than conventional methods. However, in terms of costs, precast methods tend to be more expensive in the initial stages due to the high production costs of precast elements.

Sistem Infrastruktur Teknik Sipil (SIMTEKS)Vol. 4(2)
Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP (ID)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Urban Transport Systems Analysis
0.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.