Music is Boundless but License Has Boundaries: Research on License of Streaming Music Services and the Differences Between the United States and China

This paper examines the licensing patterns of music streaming services, focusing on the challenges and opportunities presented by this rapidly growing sector. It analyzes the current statutory framework and commercial practices in the US and China, highlighting the differences in economic, political, and cultural contexts. The paper argues that the current licensing model is insufficient and unfair, particularly for artists who lack negotiation power. It proposes a more voluntary and less compulsory licensing pattern to encourage fair competition and provide artists with greater control over their work. The paper also explores the evolution of music dissemination from traditional ownership models to access-based streaming, and the impact of this shift on copyright holders, music platforms, and consumers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Science and Humanities
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(12).16
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Music is Boundless but License Has Boundaries: Research on License of Streaming Music Services and the Differences Between the United States and China

Ye Yue
Journal of Social Science and Humanities
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

Music is Boundless but License Has Boundaries: Research on License of Streaming Music Services and the Differences Between the United States and China

Ye Yue
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the licensing patterns of music streaming services, focusing on the challenges and opportunities presented by this rapidly growing sector. It analyzes the current statutory framework and commercial practices in the US and China, highlighting the differences in economic, political, and cultural contexts. The paper argues that the current licensing model is insufficient and unfair, particularly for artists who lack negotiation power. It proposes a more voluntary and less compulsory licensing pattern to encourage fair competition and provide artists with greater control over their work. The paper also explores the evolution of music dissemination from traditional ownership models to access-based streaming, and the impact of this shift on copyright holders, music platforms, and consumers.

Journal of Social Science and HumanitiesVol. 6(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.