Reading with Aunt Bunty: Intergenerational Feminism and Eighteenth-Century Studies

This essay asks: what might an intergenerational reading practice look like for feminist critics working in eighteenth-century studies? What could be learned from reading the political and institutional conditions that have shaped reading practices, past and present, in relation to each other? I consider, here, the case of Q.D. Leavis. Reading Leavis, as well as other women who studied at Cambridge in the early twentieth century, shows me how profoundly I have been shaped by Virginia Woolf’s characterization of the university and literary history’s marginalization of women writers. What would it mean to consider the eighteenth century through the lens of Leavis, rather than Woolf? What might feminist criticism gain from reflecting on the rhetorical modes and affects that shape its engagements with those who came before us?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 1640-1830
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.14.2.1420
Primary Topic
Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading with Aunt Bunty: Intergenerational Feminism and Eighteenth-Century Studies

Alison Conway
ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 1640-1830
Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
article

Reading with Aunt Bunty: Intergenerational Feminism and Eighteenth-Century Studies

Alison Conway
article en

Abstract

This essay asks: what might an intergenerational reading practice look like for feminist critics working in eighteenth-century studies? What could be learned from reading the political and institutional conditions that have shaped reading practices, past and present, in relation to each other? I consider, here, the case of Q.D. Leavis. Reading Leavis, as well as other women who studied at Cambridge in the early twentieth century, shows me how profoundly I have been shaped by Virginia Woolf’s characterization of the university and literary history’s marginalization of women writers. What would it mean to consider the eighteenth century through the lens of Leavis, rather than Woolf? What might feminist criticism gain from reflecting on the rhetorical modes and affects that shape its engagements with those who came before us?

ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 1640-1830Vol. 14(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA), Okanagan University College (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reading with Aunt Bunty: Intergenerational Feminism and Eighteenth-Century Studies — Alison Conway · ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 1640-1830 (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS