To AI Is Human: How AI Tools with Their Imperfections Enhance Learning

The education community's sentiment regarding artificial intelligence (AI) is divided. Many see it as a means to cheat and prevent students from developing their intellectual abilities because it is generative and can provide results for many domains. Just as some had predicted that paper use would go down when computers were created, the opposite occurred. AI in the classroom, when utilized effectively, promotes critical thinking and not cheating. New technology can shock and awe those who see it for the first time. Upon closer investigation, the actual capabilities are revealed. While large language models can quickly create reports from very little information, we must examine their ability to create specific reports on topics we desire. Any large language model currently available states that it can make mistakes. Students will grow by learning how to prompt AI tools to provide meaningful results, spot mistakes, and validate their results. Knowing when it is appropriate to use an AI tool and reflecting on the consequences of results being wrong brings a student to a higher level of awareness. Performing these tasks concerning AI results also brings the user into the consciousness of their fallibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of systemics, cybernetics, and informatics/Journal of systemics cybernetics and informatics
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54808/jsci.22.07.40
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To AI Is Human: How AI Tools with Their Imperfections Enhance Learning

Martin Cwiakala
1 citations
Journal of systemics, cybernetics, and informatics/Journal of systemics cybernetics and informatics
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
article

To AI Is Human: How AI Tools with Their Imperfections Enhance Learning

Martin Cwiakala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The education community's sentiment regarding artificial intelligence (AI) is divided. Many see it as a means to cheat and prevent students from developing their intellectual abilities because it is generative and can provide results for many domains. Just as some had predicted that paper use would go down when computers were created, the opposite occurred. AI in the classroom, when utilized effectively, promotes critical thinking and not cheating. New technology can shock and awe those who see it for the first time. Upon closer investigation, the actual capabilities are revealed. While large language models can quickly create reports from very little information, we must examine their ability to create specific reports on topics we desire. Any large language model currently available states that it can make mistakes. Students will grow by learning how to prompt AI tools to provide meaningful results, spot mistakes, and validate their results. Knowing when it is appropriate to use an AI tool and reflecting on the consequences of results being wrong brings a student to a higher level of awareness. Performing these tasks concerning AI results also brings the user into the consciousness of their fallibility.

Journal of systemics, cybernetics, and informatics/Journal of systemics cybernetics and informaticsVol. 22(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.