CRITICISM AND CONTINUITY OF ONTOGNOSEOLOGICAL PROVISIONS OF THE KANTIAN SYSTEM IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF F. G. HEGEL

The article provides a comparative analysis of the foundations of the philosophical systems of two prominent representatives of German classical philosophy, I. Kant and F.G. Hegel in the context of their ideological continuity. The essence of the main ontological and epistemological foundations of the worldview of two thinkers is revealed, the influence of Kant’s philosophy on Hegel is shown, and the main provisions of criticism are considered Hegel’s Kantian philosophy, as set out by him in the “Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences”, from the standpoint of an interpretative reading of this criticism, during which it consistently becomes clear that the transcendental world of man is revealed in the process of his own cognition, and Kantian philosophy practically abandons attempts at cognitive comprehension of the supersensible, citing the that it cannot be a subject of theoretical thinking, but only a matter of religious faith. In the course of the theoretical analysis, the semantic differences in the category of reason underlying both worldview systems are revealed: according to Kant, pure, or theoretical, reason is universal and necessary, but still, human consciousness, the content of which is the "ideal,‘' while Hegel is the superhuman substantial essence of all things, the ideal process of thinking of thinking itself, comprehending itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2024-489-7-84-90
Primary Topic
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CRITICISM AND CONTINUITY OF ONTOGNOSEOLOGICAL PROVISIONS OF THE KANTIAN SYSTEM IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF F. G. HEGEL

Marina P. Akhmetzyanova, Marina S. Teplykh
Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
article

CRITICISM AND CONTINUITY OF ONTOGNOSEOLOGICAL PROVISIONS OF THE KANTIAN SYSTEM IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF F. G. HEGEL

Marina P. Akhmetzyanova, Marina S. Teplykh
article en

Abstract

The article provides a comparative analysis of the foundations of the philosophical systems of two prominent representatives of German classical philosophy, I. Kant and F.G. Hegel in the context of their ideological continuity. The essence of the main ontological and epistemological foundations of the worldview of two thinkers is revealed, the influence of Kant’s philosophy on Hegel is shown, and the main provisions of criticism are considered Hegel’s Kantian philosophy, as set out by him in the “Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences”, from the standpoint of an interpretative reading of this criticism, during which it consistently becomes clear that the transcendental world of man is revealed in the process of his own cognition, and Kantian philosophy practically abandons attempts at cognitive comprehension of the supersensible, citing the that it cannot be a subject of theoretical thinking, but only a matter of religious faith. In the course of the theoretical analysis, the semantic differences in the category of reason underlying both worldview systems are revealed: according to Kant, pure, or theoretical, reason is universal and necessary, but still, human consciousness, the content of which is the "ideal,‘' while Hegel is the superhuman substantial essence of all things, the ideal process of thinking of thinking itself, comprehending itself.

Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State UniversityVol. 489(7)
Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CRITICISM AND CONTINUITY OF ONTOGNOSEOLOGICAL PROVISIONS OF THE KANTIAN SYSTEM IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF F. G. HEGEL — Marina P. Akhmetzyanova, Marina S. Teplykh · Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS