Heparin Versus Saline: A Comparative Study to Support Practice Change Within an Organization
This nurse-led research study investigates the comparative effectiveness of heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking in blood cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either heparin or 0.9% sodium chloride locking for up to 7 days. Results show no significant difference in maintaining the PICCs' patency between the 2 locking methods. Additionally, heparin was associated with more side effects, higher costs, and increased nursing time compared to 0.9% sodium chloride. These findings support adopting 0.9% sodium chloride for PICC maintenance in blood cancer patients, aiming to enhance patient safety and reduce costs.
Authors
- Folefac Atem (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1142-7806)
- Linda Denke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9680-9100)
- Kavitha Nair
- M F Gonzales
- Meredith Allen
- Ramona Warkola
Institutions
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Institute for Conflict Research (GB)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Infusion Nursing
- Published
- 2024-12-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/nan.0000000000000569
- Primary Topic
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00