GENDER BIAS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE AND LEGAL ANALYSIS

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming key industries like employment, healthcare, and criminal justice, but it also introduces significant ethical and legal challenges, particularly regarding gender bias. AI systems, often trained on biased historical data, can perpetuate and even amplify existing gender inequalities. This essay examines the legal implications of gender bias in AI, focusing on challenges to anti-discrimination laws, transparency issues, and the need for regulatory oversight. Gender bias in AI arises when systems are trained on datasets that reflect societal inequalities, leading to discriminatory outcomes. This bias is not a technical flaw, but rather a consequence of using data and algorithms that mirror patterns of discrimination. The lack of diversity among AI developers, who are predominantly male, exacerbates this issue by failing to account for the perspectives and needs of women and marginalized groups. In legal contexts, the use of AI in hiring, criminal justice, and risk assessment raises ethical concerns. AI-driven systems risk reinforcing historical gender biases, which can undermine fairness in decision-making processes. Unchecked, these biases could worsen disparities in critical areas such as recruitment and justice administration, threatening legal protections. A major legal challenge is how AI interacts with existing anti-discrimination laws. To address these challenges, transparency in AI decision-making is essential. Regulatory frameworks must evolve to require regular audits of AI systems and enforce accountability for biased outcomes. Ethical guidelines are insufficient; mandatory legal oversight is needed to ensure AI promotes fairness and inclusivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Amicus curiae.
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22201/fder.23959045e.2024.26.90464
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GENDER BIAS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE AND LEGAL ANALYSIS

D J del Bueno
1 citations
Amicus curiae.
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

GENDER BIAS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE AND LEGAL ANALYSIS

D J del Bueno
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming key industries like employment, healthcare, and criminal justice, but it also introduces significant ethical and legal challenges, particularly regarding gender bias. AI systems, often trained on biased historical data, can perpetuate and even amplify existing gender inequalities. This essay examines the legal implications of gender bias in AI, focusing on challenges to anti-discrimination laws, transparency issues, and the need for regulatory oversight. Gender bias in AI arises when systems are trained on datasets that reflect societal inequalities, leading to discriminatory outcomes. This bias is not a technical flaw, but rather a consequence of using data and algorithms that mirror patterns of discrimination. The lack of diversity among AI developers, who are predominantly male, exacerbates this issue by failing to account for the perspectives and needs of women and marginalized groups. In legal contexts, the use of AI in hiring, criminal justice, and risk assessment raises ethical concerns. AI-driven systems risk reinforcing historical gender biases, which can undermine fairness in decision-making processes. Unchecked, these biases could worsen disparities in critical areas such as recruitment and justice administration, threatening legal protections. A major legal challenge is how AI interacts with existing anti-discrimination laws. To address these challenges, transparency in AI decision-making is essential. Regulatory frameworks must evolve to require regular audits of AI systems and enforce accountability for biased outcomes. Ethical guidelines are insufficient; mandatory legal oversight is needed to ensure AI promotes fairness and inclusivity.

Amicus curiae.(26)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.