Trust, Sense of Security, and Immigration Policy Preferences of the Kenyan Public

The global refugee crisis and public backlash against immigration is at an all time high -especially toward Muslims in Christian-majority countries due to the perceived association with global terrorism.Building on theories from the communications field, we propose that listening to personal narratives may be an effective strategy for mitigating negative views of immigrant outgroups.We record two personal narratives developed in collaboration with Somalis in Kenya: one highlighting the hardships refugees face, and a second highlighting shared opposition to terrorism among Muslims and Christians.Experimental data from a representative survey in Nairobi shows that both treatments have positive effects on intergroup and policy attitudes.Strikingly, the effects are generally as large or larger among those who hold more negative baseline views.In contrast to many informational interventions, personal narratives offer an effective strategy for attenuating both negative intergroup and policy attitudes that are typically considered resistant to change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Area Studies Review
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69473/iasr.2024.27.4.401
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust, Sense of Security, and Immigration Policy Preferences of the Kenyan Public

Jeong Hwan Bae, Woo‐Jin Shin, Jangseop Byeon, Alan Dixon Brown
International Area Studies Review
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Trust, Sense of Security, and Immigration Policy Preferences of the Kenyan Public

Jeong Hwan Bae, Woo‐Jin Shin, Jangseop Byeon, Alan Dixon Brown
article en

Abstract

The global refugee crisis and public backlash against immigration is at an all time high -especially toward Muslims in Christian-majority countries due to the perceived association with global terrorism.Building on theories from the communications field, we propose that listening to personal narratives may be an effective strategy for mitigating negative views of immigrant outgroups.We record two personal narratives developed in collaboration with Somalis in Kenya: one highlighting the hardships refugees face, and a second highlighting shared opposition to terrorism among Muslims and Christians.Experimental data from a representative survey in Nairobi shows that both treatments have positive effects on intergroup and policy attitudes.Strikingly, the effects are generally as large or larger among those who hold more negative baseline views.In contrast to many informational interventions, personal narratives offer an effective strategy for attenuating both negative intergroup and policy attitudes that are typically considered resistant to change.

International Area Studies ReviewVol. 27(4)
Carnegie Corporation of New York, Vanderbilt University, Dartmouth College, National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust, Sense of Security, and Immigration Policy Preferences of the Kenyan Public — Jeong Hwan Bae, Woo‐Jin Shin, et al. · International Area Studies Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS