The Challenges of Critical Thinking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

I argue that critical thinking is based on active learning, engaged independent thinking, and examining all information including recently impactful ChatGPT and other AI sources. Thoughtfully questioning what is being learned as well as critically and creatively analyzing and evaluating information such as AI is necessary to gain a deeper understanding as an effective thinker. Critical thinking pedagogy should also promote “portability” and citizenship, including information-based online multimedia literacy such as AI, as well as employment and professional information. This means becoming a critical thinker inside and outside the classroom and take what is learned into our personal, public, and professional lives. The article begins with an examination of four discrepancies or issues related to critical thinking in higher education. The critical thinking literature and Kenedy’s Model of Cyclical Critical Thinking will then be considered. This will be followed by the discussion and summary regarding suggested guidelines for critically evaluating AI. Finally, conclusions regarding further work including pedagogical models for teaching critical thinking in the era of AI and other future work are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26417/hfdngd20
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Challenges of Critical Thinking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Robert Aaron Kenedy
12 citations
European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
Education and Critical Thinking Development
25.15
article

The Challenges of Critical Thinking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Robert Aaron Kenedy
article en
12 citations

Abstract

I argue that critical thinking is based on active learning, engaged independent thinking, and examining all information including recently impactful ChatGPT and other AI sources. Thoughtfully questioning what is being learned as well as critically and creatively analyzing and evaluating information such as AI is necessary to gain a deeper understanding as an effective thinker. Critical thinking pedagogy should also promote “portability” and citizenship, including information-based online multimedia literacy such as AI, as well as employment and professional information. This means becoming a critical thinker inside and outside the classroom and take what is learned into our personal, public, and professional lives. The article begins with an examination of four discrepancies or issues related to critical thinking in higher education. The critical thinking literature and Kenedy’s Model of Cyclical Critical Thinking will then be considered. This will be followed by the discussion and summary regarding suggested guidelines for critically evaluating AI. Finally, conclusions regarding further work including pedagogical models for teaching critical thinking in the era of AI and other future work are considered.

European Journal of Multidisciplinary StudiesVol. 9(2)
York University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
25.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Challenges of Critical Thinking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence — Robert Aaron Kenedy · European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS