Comparative Analysis of Palatal Depth and Nasal Septum Deviation in Patients with and without Maxillary Canine Impaction: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Background: The primary aim of this study was to compare palate depth and nasal septum deviation between patients with unilateral and bilateral buccal and palatal impactions of maxillary canines and those without impaction. Materials and Method: This cross-sectional study examined CBCT images of 60 patients from a private radiology archive, divided into four subgroups of 10 patients each with unilateral or bilateral buccal and palatal impactions, and a control group of 20 patients without impaction. Nasal deviation was assessed by measuring the distance of the maximum convexity of the deviated septum from the midsagittal plane in the coronal CBCT cut. Palate depth (PD) was measured as the perpendicular line from the middle of the axis connecting the mesiopalatal cusp of the first molar to the hard palate. Measurements were performed using NNT 16.3.1 software and validated by radiology and orthodontics specialists. Independent t-tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results: There were no significant differences in palate depth (p > 0.05) or nasal septum deviation (p > 0.05) between the control group and patients with unilateral or bilateral buccal and palatal impactions of maxillary canines. Conclusion: The study found no significant differences in palate depth and nasal septum deviation between patients with and without maxillary canine impaction, suggesting that impaction does not significantly affect these anatomical features. Further research is recommended to explore these findings in larger populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Galen Medical Journal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v13isp1.3694
Primary Topic
dental development and anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Palatal Depth and Nasal Septum Deviation in Patients with and without Maxillary Canine Impaction: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Fatemeh Keikhaee, Neda Shahraki, Fatemeh Kahnemuee
Galen Medical Journal
dental development and anomalies
article

Comparative Analysis of Palatal Depth and Nasal Septum Deviation in Patients with and without Maxillary Canine Impaction: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Fatemeh Keikhaee, Neda Shahraki, Fatemeh Kahnemuee
article en

Abstract

Background: The primary aim of this study was to compare palate depth and nasal septum deviation between patients with unilateral and bilateral buccal and palatal impactions of maxillary canines and those without impaction. Materials and Method: This cross-sectional study examined CBCT images of 60 patients from a private radiology archive, divided into four subgroups of 10 patients each with unilateral or bilateral buccal and palatal impactions, and a control group of 20 patients without impaction. Nasal deviation was assessed by measuring the distance of the maximum convexity of the deviated septum from the midsagittal plane in the coronal CBCT cut. Palate depth (PD) was measured as the perpendicular line from the middle of the axis connecting the mesiopalatal cusp of the first molar to the hard palate. Measurements were performed using NNT 16.3.1 software and validated by radiology and orthodontics specialists. Independent t-tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results: There were no significant differences in palate depth (p > 0.05) or nasal septum deviation (p > 0.05) between the control group and patients with unilateral or bilateral buccal and palatal impactions of maxillary canines. Conclusion: The study found no significant differences in palate depth and nasal septum deviation between patients with and without maxillary canine impaction, suggesting that impaction does not significantly affect these anatomical features. Further research is recommended to explore these findings in larger populations.

Galen Medical JournalVol. 13(SP1)
Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
dental development and anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.