Features of the implementation of polemics in the genres of scientific articles and reviews

The purpose of this paper is to examine the characteristics of polemics used in the nuclear and evaluative genres of scientific discourse. The study's goal is to identify and characterize the pecu-liarities of objectification of polemics in the genres of a scientific article, review/review, and to identify the language units that define their polemical orientation. The research's novelty is in as-sessing the extent to which the polemic manifests itself in the texts of articles, reviews, and re-views. This research identified the elements influencing the polemic in the nuclear and evaluative genres of scientific discourse. It is discovered that the article's polemical bent stems mostly from the problematic nature of the scientific knowledge offered. It has been demonstrated that the po-lemic for the review and the review is genre-dependent. Evaluation as a genre trait of reviews and surveys increases their polemical value.