On the issue of the unambiguity of the expression of quantitative relations in a noun in English

This article discusses the unambiguity of expressing quantitative relations in English nouns. The authors conclude that all the nouns they considered transmitted quantitative information. Unambiguity of uncountable nouns is achieved by contrasting the unmarked form of the noun of a single object with the marked form of the noun of multiple objects with the same noun. Collective countable nouns have inherent ambiguity, and the noun of the implied group is repeated in the plural form. Homogeneity and unambiguity of objects and unambiguity within a collective group of objects are essential for understanding the meaning of a collective term. Homogeneity allows us to distinguish individual elements within a group as a whole and helps create a clear understanding of the plural nature of the group. Collective nouns that refer to groups of similar objects are usually countable, while those that refer to heterogeneous groups are not. Abstract and concrete nouns in their unmarked forms function as a single unit, representing both a mental concept and a substance or material without entering into a numerical opposition with other concepts that cannot be quantified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of L N Gumilyov Eurasian National University FILOLOGY Series
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-678x-2024-149-4-114-122
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the issue of the unambiguity of the expression of quantitative relations in a noun in English

Zhetpisbay Aliya Kozhamuratkyzy, Rishat Zhurkenovich Saurbayev, F.T. Yerekhanova
Bulletin of L N Gumilyov Eurasian National University FILOLOGY Series
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

On the issue of the unambiguity of the expression of quantitative relations in a noun in English

Zhetpisbay Aliya Kozhamuratkyzy, Rishat Zhurkenovich Saurbayev, F.T. Yerekhanova
article en

Abstract

This article discusses the unambiguity of expressing quantitative relations in English nouns. The authors conclude that all the nouns they considered transmitted quantitative information. Unambiguity of uncountable nouns is achieved by contrasting the unmarked form of the noun of a single object with the marked form of the noun of multiple objects with the same noun. Collective countable nouns have inherent ambiguity, and the noun of the implied group is repeated in the plural form. Homogeneity and unambiguity of objects and unambiguity within a collective group of objects are essential for understanding the meaning of a collective term. Homogeneity allows us to distinguish individual elements within a group as a whole and helps create a clear understanding of the plural nature of the group. Collective nouns that refer to groups of similar objects are usually countable, while those that refer to heterogeneous groups are not. Abstract and concrete nouns in their unmarked forms function as a single unit, representing both a mental concept and a substance or material without entering into a numerical opposition with other concepts that cannot be quantified.

Bulletin of L N Gumilyov Eurasian National University FILOLOGY SeriesVol. 149(4)
Toraighyrov University (KZ), Pavlodar State Pedagogical University (KZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.