Czy obowiązujący kodeks karny nadąża za algorytmami sztucznej inteligencji?

The purpose of this study is to answer the title question, i.e. to what extent the existing provisions of the Criminal Code are sufficient, in the absence of other provisions, in the case of the use of an artificial intelligence algorithm to commit a criminal act or the occurrence of damage. The above problem has not been the direct subject of other studies. It should only be pointed out that the literature points to possible proposals where, if necessary, selected regulations of the Criminal Code can be used. Nevertheless, the dynamically changing legal situation of artificial intelligence suggests that it would be necessary to adapt the regulations to the current position of the system and its use. It should be emphasized that the application of regulations that are outdated and ultimately created for other crimes is unjustified and would conflict with the basic principles of substantive and procedural criminal law. The research in question is aimed at verifying to what extent the current provisions of the Criminal Code can be used effectively, as well as to what extent the current regulations provide the opportunity to effectively attribute responsibility to the relevant entity. At the same time, it should be emphasized that a negative answer to the current questions will prove that it is reasonable to immediately undertake an effort to create separate regulations, or additional provisions that will meet current legislative needs. The wide field of activity of the artificial intelligence algorithm justifies the statement that appropriate regulations are necessary to ensure that this fascinating system is used safely and in accordance with the letter of the law.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53024/8.4.56.2024
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Czy obowiązujący kodeks karny nadąża za algorytmami sztucznej inteligencji?

Filip Jerzy Szkiłądź
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Czy obowiązujący kodeks karny nadąża za algorytmami sztucznej inteligencji?

Filip Jerzy Szkiłądź
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to answer the title question, i.e. to what extent the existing provisions of the Criminal Code are sufficient, in the absence of other provisions, in the case of the use of an artificial intelligence algorithm to commit a criminal act or the occurrence of damage. The above problem has not been the direct subject of other studies. It should only be pointed out that the literature points to possible proposals where, if necessary, selected regulations of the Criminal Code can be used. Nevertheless, the dynamically changing legal situation of artificial intelligence suggests that it would be necessary to adapt the regulations to the current position of the system and its use. It should be emphasized that the application of regulations that are outdated and ultimately created for other crimes is unjustified and would conflict with the basic principles of substantive and procedural criminal law. The research in question is aimed at verifying to what extent the current provisions of the Criminal Code can be used effectively, as well as to what extent the current regulations provide the opportunity to effectively attribute responsibility to the relevant entity. At the same time, it should be emphasized that a negative answer to the current questions will prove that it is reasonable to immediately undertake an effort to create separate regulations, or additional provisions that will meet current legislative needs. The wide field of activity of the artificial intelligence algorithm justifies the statement that appropriate regulations are necessary to ensure that this fascinating system is used safely and in accordance with the letter of the law.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.