Exploring Ontological Truth in Mrs. Rowlandson's Captivity Narrative

This study aims to explore the social implications of ontological truth as a distinct concept in our post-truth era, where traditional, epistemologically grounded notions of truth are increasingly challenged. To this end, the study analyzes Mary Rowlandson's 17th-century captivity narrative from an ontological perspective. During her captivity, Rowlandson redefines the beings she encounters—namely, Native Americans and God—through her interactions and the unfolding of new experiences. This process yields two contrasting conceptions of these figures, highlighting the coexistence of two worlds, each with its own ontological truth. Rather than serving to dismantle or correct existing prejudices about Native Americans and God, the tension between Rowlandson's conflicting descriptions points to an encounter between two distinct worlds. Here, the central concern is not to reject one perspective in favor of another but to consider how these two truths—these two worlds—might find a way to understand each other.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Institute of Humanities at Soonchunhyang University
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35222/ihsu.2024.43.4.61
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Ontological Truth in Mrs. Rowlandson's Captivity Narrative

Hyoung-il Joo
The Institute of Humanities at Soonchunhyang University
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Exploring Ontological Truth in Mrs. Rowlandson's Captivity Narrative

Hyoung-il Joo
article en

Abstract

This study aims to explore the social implications of ontological truth as a distinct concept in our post-truth era, where traditional, epistemologically grounded notions of truth are increasingly challenged. To this end, the study analyzes Mary Rowlandson's 17th-century captivity narrative from an ontological perspective. During her captivity, Rowlandson redefines the beings she encounters—namely, Native Americans and God—through her interactions and the unfolding of new experiences. This process yields two contrasting conceptions of these figures, highlighting the coexistence of two worlds, each with its own ontological truth. Rather than serving to dismantle or correct existing prejudices about Native Americans and God, the tension between Rowlandson's conflicting descriptions points to an encounter between two distinct worlds. Here, the central concern is not to reject one perspective in favor of another but to consider how these two truths—these two worlds—might find a way to understand each other.

The Institute of Humanities at Soonchunhyang UniversityVol. 43(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.