Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditures and Agricultural Production Linkages

Out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure is the amount a patient pays directly for healthcare when insurance doesn’t cover the full cost. OOP health expenditures represent a significant financial burden on households. In Cameroon where healthcare financing is heavily reliant on OOP payments, the economic impact of health-related expenses is especially pronounced, affecting various sectors, including agriculture, which is the backbone of the country’s economy. Examining the relationship between OOP health expenditures and agricultural production is essential. This study investigates the linkages between OOP health expenditures and agricultural production. Annual time series data from 2000 to 2023 consisting of OOP health expenditure, land use, fertilizer consumption, and agricultural labor for Cameroon were used for this study. Johansen cointegration was used as a test for cointegration among variables. Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square was applied to analyze the impact of OOP health expenditures on agricultural production. Simulation was involved to generate the impact of 30% increase and decrease in OOP health expenditures on agricultural production. The findings reveal that fertilizer, land, labor, and OOP expenditures collectively explain 70% of agricultural production variance, as indicated by the coefficient of determination (R² = 0.7). The Durbin-Watson statistic of 1.44 suggests no autocorrelation. Labor positively and significantly impacts agricultural production at a 5% significance level, emphasizing the importance of labor availability for maximizing crop yields. Conversely, land expansion has a negative impact, potentially due to the cultivation of marginal lands. Additionally, a 30% increase in OOP health expenditures will decrease agricultural production, as financial resources are diverted away from farm investments while a decrease in OOP health expenditures can boost agricultural production by freeing up financial resources that can be reinvested in farming activities. The study recommends policies that enhance labor availability, improve land productivity, and reduce the financial burden of OOP health costs to boost agricultural output.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Economics and Management Review
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61093/hem.2024.4-10
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditures and Agricultural Production Linkages

Ukpe Udeme Henrietta, Sani Mohamadou
4 citations
Health Economics and Management Review
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.33
article

Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditures and Agricultural Production Linkages

Ukpe Udeme Henrietta, Sani Mohamadou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditure is the amount a patient pays directly for healthcare when insurance doesn’t cover the full cost. OOP health expenditures represent a significant financial burden on households. In Cameroon where healthcare financing is heavily reliant on OOP payments, the economic impact of health-related expenses is especially pronounced, affecting various sectors, including agriculture, which is the backbone of the country’s economy. Examining the relationship between OOP health expenditures and agricultural production is essential. This study investigates the linkages between OOP health expenditures and agricultural production. Annual time series data from 2000 to 2023 consisting of OOP health expenditure, land use, fertilizer consumption, and agricultural labor for Cameroon were used for this study. Johansen cointegration was used as a test for cointegration among variables. Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square was applied to analyze the impact of OOP health expenditures on agricultural production. Simulation was involved to generate the impact of 30% increase and decrease in OOP health expenditures on agricultural production. The findings reveal that fertilizer, land, labor, and OOP expenditures collectively explain 70% of agricultural production variance, as indicated by the coefficient of determination (R² = 0.7). The Durbin-Watson statistic of 1.44 suggests no autocorrelation. Labor positively and significantly impacts agricultural production at a 5% significance level, emphasizing the importance of labor availability for maximizing crop yields. Conversely, land expansion has a negative impact, potentially due to the cultivation of marginal lands. Additionally, a 30% increase in OOP health expenditures will decrease agricultural production, as financial resources are diverted away from farm investments while a decrease in OOP health expenditures can boost agricultural production by freeing up financial resources that can be reinvested in farming activities. The study recommends policies that enhance labor availability, improve land productivity, and reduce the financial burden of OOP health costs to boost agricultural output.

Health Economics and Management ReviewVol. 5(4)
Federal University Lafia (NG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.