University Leadership: Transparency in Communication with External Stakeholders

The research offers valuable insights into the importance of transparency in building trust, accountability, and a positive reputation for universities in Ukraine. The relevance of this topic is underscored by the growing global emphasis on the need for higher education institutions to communicate transparently with external audiences, including prospective students, parents, funding agencies, and the general public. Transparency in financial operations, governance, and academic offerings has become crucial for universities to attract talented individuals, secure financial support, and develop lasting partnerships. The study’s methodology – the K-means clustering technique ‒ effectively assesses university transparency. It clusters institutions based on shared transparency characteristics, allowing for the identification of distinct patterns and the classification of Ukrainian universities into specific groups. This approach provided a comprehensive understanding of universities’ performance in external communication. The Elbow Method was employed to establish the ideal number of clusters, dividing universities into four main clusters, each demonstrating varying degrees of transparency. The findings revealed that universities across different clusters exhibited unique transparency profiles. While some universities performed exceptionally well across multiple transparency criteria, others showed significant shortcomings, particularly in budget reporting and staff transparency. The results indicated that some universities emerged as transparency leaders, serving as models for others, while those in lower-performing clusters require targeted improvements in their communication strategies. The study highlights the practical impact of transparency on university governance and engagement with stakeholders. Universities that prioritize transparency build trust with external audiences and strengthen internal decision-making processes. The clustering method provided essential insights into which institutions lead in transparency and where improvements are necessary, reinforcing that transparency is key to ensuring competitiveness within the higher education landscape. This research broadens the understanding of transparency in higher education, offering practical recommendations for universities seeking to enhance their external communication practices. The study underscores the importance of aligning these efforts with international transparency standards to ensure long-term success and maintain credibility in the increasingly competitive global academic environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Ethics and Leadership
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61093/bel.8(4).16-36.2024
Citations
4
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University Leadership: Transparency in Communication with External Stakeholders

Olena Churikanova, Nadiia Аrtyukhova, Kseniia Bliumska-Danko
4 citations
Business Ethics and Leadership
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
2.92
article

University Leadership: Transparency in Communication with External Stakeholders

Olena Churikanova, Nadiia Аrtyukhova, Kseniia Bliumska-Danko
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The research offers valuable insights into the importance of transparency in building trust, accountability, and a positive reputation for universities in Ukraine. The relevance of this topic is underscored by the growing global emphasis on the need for higher education institutions to communicate transparently with external audiences, including prospective students, parents, funding agencies, and the general public. Transparency in financial operations, governance, and academic offerings has become crucial for universities to attract talented individuals, secure financial support, and develop lasting partnerships. The study’s methodology – the K-means clustering technique ‒ effectively assesses university transparency. It clusters institutions based on shared transparency characteristics, allowing for the identification of distinct patterns and the classification of Ukrainian universities into specific groups. This approach provided a comprehensive understanding of universities’ performance in external communication. The Elbow Method was employed to establish the ideal number of clusters, dividing universities into four main clusters, each demonstrating varying degrees of transparency. The findings revealed that universities across different clusters exhibited unique transparency profiles. While some universities performed exceptionally well across multiple transparency criteria, others showed significant shortcomings, particularly in budget reporting and staff transparency. The results indicated that some universities emerged as transparency leaders, serving as models for others, while those in lower-performing clusters require targeted improvements in their communication strategies. The study highlights the practical impact of transparency on university governance and engagement with stakeholders. Universities that prioritize transparency build trust with external audiences and strengthen internal decision-making processes. The clustering method provided essential insights into which institutions lead in transparency and where improvements are necessary, reinforcing that transparency is key to ensuring competitiveness within the higher education landscape. This research broadens the understanding of transparency in higher education, offering practical recommendations for universities seeking to enhance their external communication practices. The study underscores the importance of aligning these efforts with international transparency standards to ensure long-term success and maintain credibility in the increasingly competitive global academic environment.

Business Ethics and LeadershipVol. 8(4)
Sumy State University (UA), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), TU Bergakademie Freiberg (DE), Bratislava University of Economics and Business (SK)
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.