Stochastic Analysis of Buy and Hold Versus Annual Rebalancing Portfolio Strategies

Numerous articles in the literature develop theoretical mathematical models that prove rebalancing investment portfolios will outperform a buy and hold strategy on a risk adjusted basis. However, a number of authors using varying asset classes and time periods have found instances where buy and hold outperforms a rebalancing strategy on a risk adjusted basis. This research shows that both can be correct. Most of the papers found in the literature use historical prices and price changes to validate their findings. The research effort detailed in this paper simulates a wide range of possible future asset pricing scenarios that do not rely on historical price patterns. These findings suggest that differences between these two strategies, at a more detailed level, favor the rebalancing strategy, but not exclusively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Finance Issues
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58886/jfi.v22i3.8384
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stochastic Analysis of Buy and Hold Versus Annual Rebalancing Portfolio Strategies

Michael D. Mattei
3 citations
Journal of Finance Issues
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.39
article

Stochastic Analysis of Buy and Hold Versus Annual Rebalancing Portfolio Strategies

Michael D. Mattei
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Numerous articles in the literature develop theoretical mathematical models that prove rebalancing investment portfolios will outperform a buy and hold strategy on a risk adjusted basis. However, a number of authors using varying asset classes and time periods have found instances where buy and hold outperforms a rebalancing strategy on a risk adjusted basis. This research shows that both can be correct. Most of the papers found in the literature use historical prices and price changes to validate their findings. The research effort detailed in this paper simulates a wide range of possible future asset pricing scenarios that do not rely on historical price patterns. These findings suggest that differences between these two strategies, at a more detailed level, favor the rebalancing strategy, but not exclusively.

Journal of Finance IssuesVol. 22(3)
Bellarmine University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stochastic Analysis of Buy and Hold Versus Annual Rebalancing Portfolio Strategies — Michael D. Mattei · Journal of Finance Issues (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS