A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NON-JUDICIAL REMEDIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS IN NIGERIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

This study conducts a comparative analysis of non-judicial remedies for administrative acts in Nigeria and the United Kingdom. Non-judicial remedies play a vital role in administrative law by offering accessible and efficient avenues for addressing grievances arising from administrative decisions. The research examines the legal frameworks, procedural mechanisms, and practical effectiveness of non-judicial remedies in both Countries. By comparing the systems in Nigeria and the United Kingdom, the study aims to highlight similarities, differences, strengths, and weaknesses in the implementation of non-judicial remedies. Through this comparative analysis, insights are provided into the capacity of these remedies to ensure fairness, accountability, and transparency in public administration. The doctrinal method for data collection, comprised of the analysis of numerous primary and secondary sources of data, is utilized in this study, with a view of offering insights into the effectiveness of Non-judicial remedies in these Countries. The study finds that despite differences in legal frameworks and procedural mechanisms, both Countries face challenges in ensuring the effectiveness of non-judicial remedies in practice. Issues such as delays, bureaucratic hurdles, and limited awareness among citizens impact the efficacy of these remedies in addressing administrative grievances. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of administrative justice systems and provide valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and scholars in both countries. This paper recommends the following: Increase Public Awareness and Accessibility; Information Dissemination; Strengthen Institutional Capacity/Funding and Resources; Training Programs; Promote Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR); Encourage Freedom of Information (FOI) Act Compliance; Regular Audits; Foster Collaboration and Exchange of Best Practices/International Collaboration; Workshops and Conferences; Implement Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms/Feedback Systems; Performance Metrics, Legal and Policy Reforms ,Policy Updates, as crucial steps for improving the accessibility and effectiveness of non-judicial remedies in Nigeria.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v18i2.6989
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NON-JUDICIAL REMEDIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS IN NIGERIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

Irenagbe Precious Eshemo-Omo, Eregbuonye Obieshi
Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences
Law, logistics, and international trade
article

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NON-JUDICIAL REMEDIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS IN NIGERIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

Irenagbe Precious Eshemo-Omo, Eregbuonye Obieshi
article en

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of non-judicial remedies for administrative acts in Nigeria and the United Kingdom. Non-judicial remedies play a vital role in administrative law by offering accessible and efficient avenues for addressing grievances arising from administrative decisions. The research examines the legal frameworks, procedural mechanisms, and practical effectiveness of non-judicial remedies in both Countries. By comparing the systems in Nigeria and the United Kingdom, the study aims to highlight similarities, differences, strengths, and weaknesses in the implementation of non-judicial remedies. Through this comparative analysis, insights are provided into the capacity of these remedies to ensure fairness, accountability, and transparency in public administration. The doctrinal method for data collection, comprised of the analysis of numerous primary and secondary sources of data, is utilized in this study, with a view of offering insights into the effectiveness of Non-judicial remedies in these Countries. The study finds that despite differences in legal frameworks and procedural mechanisms, both Countries face challenges in ensuring the effectiveness of non-judicial remedies in practice. Issues such as delays, bureaucratic hurdles, and limited awareness among citizens impact the efficacy of these remedies in addressing administrative grievances. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of administrative justice systems and provide valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and scholars in both countries. This paper recommends the following: Increase Public Awareness and Accessibility; Information Dissemination; Strengthen Institutional Capacity/Funding and Resources; Training Programs; Promote Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR); Encourage Freedom of Information (FOI) Act Compliance; Regular Audits; Foster Collaboration and Exchange of Best Practices/International Collaboration; Workshops and Conferences; Implement Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms/Feedback Systems; Performance Metrics, Legal and Policy Reforms ,Policy Updates, as crucial steps for improving the accessibility and effectiveness of non-judicial remedies in Nigeria.

Agora International Journal of Juridical SciencesVol. 18(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Law, logistics, and international trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NON-JUDICIAL REMEDIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS IN NIGERIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM — Irenagbe Precious Eshemo-Omo, Eregbuonye Obieshi · Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS