DILATORY ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Dilatory or delayed adjudication of disputes has always been a threat to justice. This trend is not peculiar to any State or region. It is universal. Courts at domestic and international levels have grappled with it. This article embarks on a detailed exposition of specific cases and how the actors' conduct bogged down the court's affairs. It highlights the unique ways that the States, International Organisations, litigants, legal representatives and the courts have abused time limits meant to perform legal acts. This article constrains itself to Nigerian courts, the International Court of Justice, and the United Kingdom. This article is expository, not comparative. It proffers statutory amendment and stricter measures by the courts as the way forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v18i2.6971
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DILATORY ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Chinedu Collins Aguocha
Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

DILATORY ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Chinedu Collins Aguocha
article en

Abstract

Dilatory or delayed adjudication of disputes has always been a threat to justice. This trend is not peculiar to any State or region. It is universal. Courts at domestic and international levels have grappled with it. This article embarks on a detailed exposition of specific cases and how the actors' conduct bogged down the court's affairs. It highlights the unique ways that the States, International Organisations, litigants, legal representatives and the courts have abused time limits meant to perform legal acts. This article constrains itself to Nigerian courts, the International Court of Justice, and the United Kingdom. This article is expository, not comparative. It proffers statutory amendment and stricter measures by the courts as the way forward.

Agora International Journal of Juridical SciencesVol. 18(2)
University of Nigeria (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.