Nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized, intubated adult patients: A comparison between combined lateral position with throat pack in situ and lateral position alone

Background: Although the proper placement of nasogastric tube (NGT) is usually a simple procedure, it may be challenging one in case of its placement in anesthetized intubated patients. At times, it may be tiresome even for the expert anesthesiologist. Different techniques have varying success rates. Many novel techniques are entering the avenue to be tested. Combinations of different techniques are showing improved success rates over individual techniques. Aims and Objectives: This interventional study primarily aimed at comparing the success rates of proper placement of NGT in the first attempt between the “combined lateral position with throat pack in situ” and “lateral position alone.” Materials and Methods: The present study was performed on 180 adults (≥18 years), posted for abdominal surgeries requiring NGT insertion. Patients received NGT placement using the “combined lateral position with throat pack in situ” technique (Group A, n=80) or lateral position alone (Group B, n=80). The proportion of patients in whom correct placement of NGT was possible in the first attempt using either of the techniques (primary outcome), the procedure time for successful placement of NGT, and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the groups. Results: Correct placement of NGT in the first attempt was possible in considerably higher proportions of patients using the combined technique over lateral position alone (87.5% vs. 68.75%, P=0.007). The procedure time was comparable in both groups (23.7±6.6 vs. 25.2±5.2, combined vs. lateral position alone, P=0.093). Coiling was found to be considerably reduced in the combined method compared with the “lateral position alone” (8.75% vs.17.5%, P=0.03). Conclusion: Combined lateral position with throat pack in situ technique can be a better alternative to “lateral position alone” for NGT insertion in anesthetized, intubated adult patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v15i10.4226
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized, intubated adult patients: A comparison between combined lateral position with throat pack in situ and lateral position alone

Mohanchandra Mandal, Sangita Mandal, Sarfraaz Rahman, Soma Chakraborty et al.
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized, intubated adult patients: A comparison between combined lateral position with throat pack in situ and lateral position alone

Mohanchandra Mandal, Sangita Mandal, Sarfraaz Rahman, Soma Chakraborty, Rajdeep Biswas, Subha Sankar Das
article en

Abstract

Background: Although the proper placement of nasogastric tube (NGT) is usually a simple procedure, it may be challenging one in case of its placement in anesthetized intubated patients. At times, it may be tiresome even for the expert anesthesiologist. Different techniques have varying success rates. Many novel techniques are entering the avenue to be tested. Combinations of different techniques are showing improved success rates over individual techniques. Aims and Objectives: This interventional study primarily aimed at comparing the success rates of proper placement of NGT in the first attempt between the “combined lateral position with throat pack in situ” and “lateral position alone.” Materials and Methods: The present study was performed on 180 adults (≥18 years), posted for abdominal surgeries requiring NGT insertion. Patients received NGT placement using the “combined lateral position with throat pack in situ” technique (Group A, n=80) or lateral position alone (Group B, n=80). The proportion of patients in whom correct placement of NGT was possible in the first attempt using either of the techniques (primary outcome), the procedure time for successful placement of NGT, and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the groups. Results: Correct placement of NGT in the first attempt was possible in considerably higher proportions of patients using the combined technique over lateral position alone (87.5% vs. 68.75%, P=0.007). The procedure time was comparable in both groups (23.7±6.6 vs. 25.2±5.2, combined vs. lateral position alone, P=0.093). Coiling was found to be considerably reduced in the combined method compared with the “lateral position alone” (8.75% vs.17.5%, P=0.03). Conclusion: Combined lateral position with throat pack in situ technique can be a better alternative to “lateral position alone” for NGT insertion in anesthetized, intubated adult patients.

Asian Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 15(10)
Bankura Sammilani Medical College (IN), Government of West Bengal (IN), Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN), Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.