Práxis dialógica, pesquisa como princípio formativo e a formação das novas gerações em Benincá

The present text aims to focus on a potential relation among dialogical praxis, research as a formative principle and formation of new generations. In order to do this, we begin by resuming the dialogical praxis in educational and philosophical hermeneutic tradition indicating the formative dimensions contained in it. In this regard, Gadamer’s contributions (1999; 2002) stand out, as well as their implications for the educational field carried out by authors such as Hermann (2002) and Cruz (2010), among others. In the following step, always considering the hermeneutic role of dialogical praxis, we go into Benincá’s work to explore the way how he takes common sense as the basis of praxis methodology research. This step allows us to advance by thematizing the existing articulation among the praxis method, the researcher’s continuing education and the research group’s formative role. In conclusion, we demonstrate the contribution which this approach brings to the formation of new generations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Teopráxis
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52451/9c8q7v60
Primary Topic
Education Pedagogy and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Práxis dialógica, pesquisa como princípio formativo e a formação das novas gerações em Benincá

Altair Alberto Fávero, Ângelo Vitório Cenci
Revista Teopráxis
Education Pedagogy and Practices
article

Práxis dialógica, pesquisa como princípio formativo e a formação das novas gerações em Benincá

Altair Alberto Fávero, Ângelo Vitório Cenci
article en

Abstract

The present text aims to focus on a potential relation among dialogical praxis, research as a formative principle and formation of new generations. In order to do this, we begin by resuming the dialogical praxis in educational and philosophical hermeneutic tradition indicating the formative dimensions contained in it. In this regard, Gadamer’s contributions (1999; 2002) stand out, as well as their implications for the educational field carried out by authors such as Hermann (2002) and Cruz (2010), among others. In the following step, always considering the hermeneutic role of dialogical praxis, we go into Benincá’s work to explore the way how he takes common sense as the basis of praxis methodology research. This step allows us to advance by thematizing the existing articulation among the praxis method, the researcher’s continuing education and the research group’s formative role. In conclusion, we demonstrate the contribution which this approach brings to the formation of new generations.

Revista TeopráxisVol. 41(137)
Universidade de Passo Fundo (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Education Pedagogy and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Práxis dialógica, pesquisa como princípio formativo e a formação das novas gerações em Benincá — Altair Alberto Fávero, Ângelo Vitório Cenci · Revista Teopráxis (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS