Leadership or Symbolism? Evaluating India’s Contradictions in Global South Diplomacy and Strategic Exclusions

India’s self-positioning in the Global South faces substantial challenges and contradictions, limiting its capacity to assert genuine leadership. Although India has undertaken initiatives such as hosting the Voice of the Global South Summit and promoting priorities relevant to developing countries, these efforts are frequently manifested as symbolic gestures rather than producing significant and actionable outcomes. The dual role India seeks—acting as a leader in the Global South while simultaneously aligning closely with the United States in the Indo-Pacific strategy—creates inconsistencies within its foreign policy framework, thereby undermining its credibility on the global stage. Additionally, India’s decision to exclude key developing nations such as China, Pakistan, and Brazil from its Global South diplomacy further emphasizes the limitations of its approach. This exclusion not only reflects strategic miscalculations but also complicates India’s ability to effectively advocate for the interests of the Global South. As a result, India faces significant difficulties in reconciling its national interests with the collective aspirations of the Global South, which may hinder its potentiality to foster meaningful partnerships and promote a cohesive strategy for global governance. India’s contradictory foreign policy and exclusion of key developing nations undermine its aspirations for a cohesive Global South leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Peace and Diplomacy
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59111/jpd.005.02.087
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leadership or Symbolism? Evaluating India’s Contradictions in Global South Diplomacy and Strategic Exclusions

Yaling Guo, L Long
Journal of Peace and Diplomacy
International Development and Aid
article

Leadership or Symbolism? Evaluating India’s Contradictions in Global South Diplomacy and Strategic Exclusions

Yaling Guo, L Long
article en

Abstract

India’s self-positioning in the Global South faces substantial challenges and contradictions, limiting its capacity to assert genuine leadership. Although India has undertaken initiatives such as hosting the Voice of the Global South Summit and promoting priorities relevant to developing countries, these efforts are frequently manifested as symbolic gestures rather than producing significant and actionable outcomes. The dual role India seeks—acting as a leader in the Global South while simultaneously aligning closely with the United States in the Indo-Pacific strategy—creates inconsistencies within its foreign policy framework, thereby undermining its credibility on the global stage. Additionally, India’s decision to exclude key developing nations such as China, Pakistan, and Brazil from its Global South diplomacy further emphasizes the limitations of its approach. This exclusion not only reflects strategic miscalculations but also complicates India’s ability to effectively advocate for the interests of the Global South. As a result, India faces significant difficulties in reconciling its national interests with the collective aspirations of the Global South, which may hinder its potentiality to foster meaningful partnerships and promote a cohesive strategy for global governance. India’s contradictory foreign policy and exclusion of key developing nations undermine its aspirations for a cohesive Global South leadership.

Journal of Peace and DiplomacyVol. 5(2)
Hebei Normal University (CN)
Reduced inequalities, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.