Acceptability and validity of a smartphone‐administered word list learning test, LILA, in cognitively unimpaired adults

The very low rate of data loss indicates high acceptability of LILA in CU middle- and older-aged adults. Validity of performance was indicated by the learning curves, which were qualitatively similar to those of the rater-administered ISLT, and the effect of age on the immediate recall outcome. These data provide a strong foundation for future studies of the sensitivity of LILA to memory impairment in AD.