Remote digital memory assessment in middle‐aged and older adults: Feasibility, reliability, and construct validity
Challenges to participation occurred primarily during enrollment; future studies may allocate additional support facilitating registration and initial task completion within the application. Acceptability of the mobile tasks was high. The mobile memory paradigms exhibited moderate test-retest reliability and were significantly related to gold-standard cognitive tests. Overall, findings support preliminary feasibility, reliability, and validity of the neotiv tasks in assessing memory function in cognitively healthy adults enriched for AD risk.
Authors
- Emrah Düzel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-5388)
- David Berron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1558-1883)
- Kristin E Basche (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-8507)
- Amanda L. Peterson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7872-0874)
- Hannah L. Rosario
- Lindsay R. Clark (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-7627)
- Sterling C. Johnson
Institutions
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Alzheimer s & Dementia
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089786
- Primary Topic
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00