Cochlear implantation in adults with acquired single-sided deafness improves cortical processing and comprehension of speech presented to the non-implanted ears: a longitudinal EEG study

Former studies have established that individuals with a cochlear implant (CI) for treating single-sided deafness experience improved speech processing after implantation. However, it is not clear how each ear contributes separately to improve speech perception over time at the behavioural and neural level. In this longitudinal EEG study with four different time points, we measured neural activity in response to various temporally and spectrally degraded spoken words presented monaurally to the CI and non-CI ears (5 left and 5 right ears) in 10 single-sided CI users and 10 age- and sex-matched individuals with normal hearing. Subjective comprehension ratings for each word were also recorded. Data from single-sided CI participants were collected pre-CI implantation, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after implantation. We conducted a time-resolved representational similarity analysis on the EEG data to quantify whether and how neural patterns became more similar to those of normal hearing individuals. At 6 months after implantation, the speech comprehension ratings for the degraded words improved in both ears. Notably, the improvement was more pronounced for the non-CI ears than the CI ears. Furthermore, the enhancement in the non-CI ears was paralleled by increased similarity to neural representational patterns of the normal hearing control group. The maximum of this effect coincided with peak decoding accuracy for spoken-word comprehension (600-1200 ms after stimulus onset). The present data demonstrate that cortical processing gradually normalizes within months after CI implantation for speech presented to the non-CI ear. CI enables the deaf ear to provide afferent input, which, according to our results, complements the input of the non-CI ear, gradually improving its function. These novel findings underscore the feasibility of tracking neural recovery after auditory input restoration using advanced multivariate analysis methods, such as representational similarity analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Communications
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf001
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cochlear implantation in adults with acquired single-sided deafness improves cortical processing and comprehension of speech presented to the non-implanted ears: a longitudinal EEG study

Tobias Kleinjung, Ya‐Ping Chen, Sarang S. Dalal, Sabine Leske et al.
4 citations
Brain Communications
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.37
article

Cochlear implantation in adults with acquired single-sided deafness improves cortical processing and comprehension of speech presented to the non-implanted ears: a longitudinal EEG study

Tobias Kleinjung, Ya‐Ping Chen, Sarang S. Dalal, Sabine Leske, Nicole Peter, Nathan Weisz, Patrick Neff, Jonas Obleser, Andrew Dimitrijevic, Daniel D.E. Wong
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Former studies have established that individuals with a cochlear implant (CI) for treating single-sided deafness experience improved speech processing after implantation. However, it is not clear how each ear contributes separately to improve speech perception over time at the behavioural and neural level. In this longitudinal EEG study with four different time points, we measured neural activity in response to various temporally and spectrally degraded spoken words presented monaurally to the CI and non-CI ears (5 left and 5 right ears) in 10 single-sided CI users and 10 age- and sex-matched individuals with normal hearing. Subjective comprehension ratings for each word were also recorded. Data from single-sided CI participants were collected pre-CI implantation, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after implantation. We conducted a time-resolved representational similarity analysis on the EEG data to quantify whether and how neural patterns became more similar to those of normal hearing individuals. At 6 months after implantation, the speech comprehension ratings for the degraded words improved in both ears. Notably, the improvement was more pronounced for the non-CI ears than the CI ears. Furthermore, the enhancement in the non-CI ears was paralleled by increased similarity to neural representational patterns of the normal hearing control group. The maximum of this effect coincided with peak decoding accuracy for spoken-word comprehension (600-1200 ms after stimulus onset). The present data demonstrate that cortical processing gradually normalizes within months after CI implantation for speech presented to the non-CI ear. CI enables the deaf ear to provide afferent input, which, according to our results, complements the input of the non-CI ear, gradually improving its function. These novel findings underscore the feasibility of tracking neural recovery after auditory input restoration using advanced multivariate analysis methods, such as representational similarity analysis.

Brain CommunicationsVol. 7(1)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Salzburg (AT), Norwegian Academy of Music (NO), University of Oslo (NO), University of Toronto (CA), University of Konstanz (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Aarhus University (DK), Paracelsus Medical University (AT), Health Sciences Centre (CA), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Christian Doppler Klinik (AT), Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod (FR), Pädagogische Hochschule Salzburg (AT), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), University of Regensburg (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Fondation Pour l'Audition, Austrian Science Fund
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.