Reconstructing The Relationship Regional Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia with Regional Government for The Optimization of Regional Autonomy

As a regional representative institution, the Regional Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia (DPD) was born from the idea of changing the representative system into a two-chamber representative system and increasing regional participation in the course of politics and state management. The ideal concept of DPD, was initially to accommodate the principle of regional representation and regional empowerment. DPD as a regional representative in carrying out its duties and functions requires effective coordination with the Regional Government as the executor of executive power in the region. Empirically, the construction of the relationship between the DPD and the regional government is currently not optimal. One of the obligations of the DPD is to follow up on regional aspirations and interests is still carried out normatively and ineffectively. This is certainly not ideal as the construction of Article 18, Article 18A, Article 18B, Article 22D, and Article 23 of the UUD 1945 are interrelated. Where the presence of the DPD (in Article 22D) as a regional representative institution is necessary to maintain the existence of the region (Article 18, Article 18A, and Article 18B). Based on the research findings, it is important to recommend that central government along with the DPR and DPD need to consider special arrangements in the form of affirmation of decentralized authority and effective central-regional relations, especially to resolve regional problems. Meanwhile, there needs to be a reconstruction of the DPD's supervisory and budget functions that have a direct impact on the community and regions; optimization of existing functions, such as the monitoring and evaluation function of draft regional regulations and regional regulations, as well as the monitoring and review function of laws for the harmonization of central-regional laws; and there needs to be a pattern of support for the DPD to optimize its performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5257
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstructing The Relationship Regional Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia with Regional Government for The Optimization of Regional Autonomy

A. Teras Narang, Maruarar Siahaan, John Pieris, Hanugra Ryantoni
Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Reconstructing The Relationship Regional Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia with Regional Government for The Optimization of Regional Autonomy

A. Teras Narang, Maruarar Siahaan, John Pieris, Hanugra Ryantoni
article en

Abstract

As a regional representative institution, the Regional Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia (DPD) was born from the idea of changing the representative system into a two-chamber representative system and increasing regional participation in the course of politics and state management. The ideal concept of DPD, was initially to accommodate the principle of regional representation and regional empowerment. DPD as a regional representative in carrying out its duties and functions requires effective coordination with the Regional Government as the executor of executive power in the region. Empirically, the construction of the relationship between the DPD and the regional government is currently not optimal. One of the obligations of the DPD is to follow up on regional aspirations and interests is still carried out normatively and ineffectively. This is certainly not ideal as the construction of Article 18, Article 18A, Article 18B, Article 22D, and Article 23 of the UUD 1945 are interrelated. Where the presence of the DPD (in Article 22D) as a regional representative institution is necessary to maintain the existence of the region (Article 18, Article 18A, and Article 18B). Based on the research findings, it is important to recommend that central government along with the DPR and DPD need to consider special arrangements in the form of affirmation of decentralized authority and effective central-regional relations, especially to resolve regional problems. Meanwhile, there needs to be a reconstruction of the DPD's supervisory and budget functions that have a direct impact on the community and regions; optimization of existing functions, such as the monitoring and evaluation function of draft regional regulations and regional regulations, as well as the monitoring and review function of laws for the harmonization of central-regional laws; and there needs to be a pattern of support for the DPD to optimize its performance.

Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian HukumVol. 23(3)
Universitas Kristen Indonesia (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconstructing The Relationship Regional Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia with Regional Government for The Optimization of Regional Autonomy — A. Teras Narang, Maruarar Siahaan, et al. · Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS