Impact of Auditors’ Industry Specialization and Longevity on Professional Skepticism

As a result of financial scandals, such as GE Co. and AIG, professional skepticism received increased significance in the field of auditing. Grounded in Hurtt’ s professional skepticism framework, this quantitative correlational study aimed to examine the relationship between years of auditor experience, the extent of industry specialization of the auditor, and the variation in the level of professional skepticism. The study included data from 68 U.S. accountants and auditors. The results of the multiple regression model showed that at F(2, 65) = 4.414, p = 0.016, R2 = 0.12, auditor’s industry specialization was a significant factor, which is positively associated with professional skepticism. Auditor’s industry specialization was statistically significant (ß= .316, t = 2.704, p = .009), accounting for a higher contribution to the model. Auditor’s longevity in the field was not statistically significant, thus, did not explain any significant variance in the performance of professional skepticism. The results of this study extended research on professional skepticism attributes and expanded our understanding of predictive variables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting and Finance
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v24i5.7469
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Auditors’ Industry Specialization and Longevity on Professional Skepticism

Roger Mayer, Medhanie Mekonnen, Wen-Wen Chien, Robert Sollfrey
Journal of Accounting and Finance
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Impact of Auditors’ Industry Specialization and Longevity on Professional Skepticism

Roger Mayer, Medhanie Mekonnen, Wen-Wen Chien, Robert Sollfrey
article en

Abstract

As a result of financial scandals, such as GE Co. and AIG, professional skepticism received increased significance in the field of auditing. Grounded in Hurtt’ s professional skepticism framework, this quantitative correlational study aimed to examine the relationship between years of auditor experience, the extent of industry specialization of the auditor, and the variation in the level of professional skepticism. The study included data from 68 U.S. accountants and auditors. The results of the multiple regression model showed that at F(2, 65) = 4.414, p = 0.016, R2 = 0.12, auditor’s industry specialization was a significant factor, which is positively associated with professional skepticism. Auditor’s industry specialization was statistically significant (ß= .316, t = 2.704, p = .009), accounting for a higher contribution to the model. Auditor’s longevity in the field was not statistically significant, thus, did not explain any significant variance in the performance of professional skepticism. The results of this study extended research on professional skepticism attributes and expanded our understanding of predictive variables.

Journal of Accounting and FinanceVol. 24(5)
Berkeley College (US), SUNY Old Westbury (US), Northeast Iowa Community College (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.