Empowering accessibility: The dynamics of assistive technology acquisition

BACKGROUND While it has been broadly agreed that there is a need for consolidated information about assistive technology, previous attempts have not been sufficient for detailed consumer demands. OBJECTIVE Researchers sought consumer feedback to determine what should be included in a comprehensive, accessible database of AT. METHODS We conducted focus groups with different stakeholder groups (people with diverse disabilities, practitioners, and circles of support). We used a framework analysis to map participant responses to the research questions using focus group transcripts and notes. RESULTS AT users are looking for quick access to certain information such as the cost versus benefit, reliability, funding, and compatibility. They expect to find this in a variety of formats (video, audio, text) with a collaborative element (reviews and recommendations) from other users. CONCLUSIONS In an AT product database, users want the option to search by activity rather than only disability category, as disability can fluctuate. Accessibility of the database is key, with people preferring modifiable and flexible formats for both adding and consuming information. A community of practice will foster the connections people require to confirm their decisions prior to purchase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology and Disability
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10554181241301924
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empowering accessibility: The dynamics of assistive technology acquisition

Nathan W. Moon, Maureen Linden, Frances Harris, Julie Eshleman
Technology and Disability
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Empowering accessibility: The dynamics of assistive technology acquisition

Nathan W. Moon, Maureen Linden, Frances Harris, Julie Eshleman
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND While it has been broadly agreed that there is a need for consolidated information about assistive technology, previous attempts have not been sufficient for detailed consumer demands. OBJECTIVE Researchers sought consumer feedback to determine what should be included in a comprehensive, accessible database of AT. METHODS We conducted focus groups with different stakeholder groups (people with diverse disabilities, practitioners, and circles of support). We used a framework analysis to map participant responses to the research questions using focus group transcripts and notes. RESULTS AT users are looking for quick access to certain information such as the cost versus benefit, reliability, funding, and compatibility. They expect to find this in a variety of formats (video, audio, text) with a collaborative element (reviews and recommendations) from other users. CONCLUSIONS In an AT product database, users want the option to search by activity rather than only disability category, as disability can fluctuate. Accessibility of the database is key, with people preferring modifiable and flexible formats for both adding and consuming information. A community of practice will foster the connections people require to confirm their decisions prior to purchase.

Technology and DisabilityVol. 36(4)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Empowering accessibility: The dynamics of assistive technology acquisition — Nathan W. Moon, Maureen Linden, et al. · Technology and Disability (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS