Status and Role of Educational Technology Reconsidered - A Comparison of the Perspectives of Activity Theory and Posthumanist Philosopy

This study examines the status and role of technology in educational activities through a comparative analysis of activity theory and contemporary technology theory. Activity theory conceptualizes technology as a tool for achieving human goals, emphasizing its role as a medium for goal-oriented actions while not recognizing its autonomy. Rooted in the theories of Vygotsky and Leontyev, activity theory restricts technology to a subordinate role under human intentions. While Engestrom’s expanded activity theory broadens this view, it remains anthropocentric. In contrast, contemporary technology theory positions technology as an autonomous actor, equivalent to humans, actively transforming educational environments and reshaping learning processes. By comparing these perspectives, this paper highlights the importance of reconceptualizing technology in education as an autonomous agent rather than a mere tool, underscoring its potential to play a pivotal role in the future of education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Knowledge and Convergence Association
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47636/gkca.2024.7.2.29
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Status and Role of Educational Technology Reconsidered - A Comparison of the Perspectives of Activity Theory and Posthumanist Philosopy

Yangjoo Park
Global Knowledge and Convergence Association
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
article

Status and Role of Educational Technology Reconsidered - A Comparison of the Perspectives of Activity Theory and Posthumanist Philosopy

Yangjoo Park
article en

Abstract

This study examines the status and role of technology in educational activities through a comparative analysis of activity theory and contemporary technology theory. Activity theory conceptualizes technology as a tool for achieving human goals, emphasizing its role as a medium for goal-oriented actions while not recognizing its autonomy. Rooted in the theories of Vygotsky and Leontyev, activity theory restricts technology to a subordinate role under human intentions. While Engestrom’s expanded activity theory broadens this view, it remains anthropocentric. In contrast, contemporary technology theory positions technology as an autonomous actor, equivalent to humans, actively transforming educational environments and reshaping learning processes. By comparing these perspectives, this paper highlights the importance of reconceptualizing technology in education as an autonomous agent rather than a mere tool, underscoring its potential to play a pivotal role in the future of education.

Global Knowledge and Convergence AssociationVol. 7(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.