Externalities of Financial Fraud: Competitor Reaction and Cross-Sectoral Impact of the Luckin Coffee Scandal

This study examines the impact of the Luckin Coffee financial fraud scandal on abnormal stock returns across related and unrelated industries. Using a Difference- in-Differences (DID) methodology, this study examines market reactions to two key events: the initial fraud allegations in the Muddy Waters report (January 31, 2020) and Luckin Coffees admission of fraudulent activities (April 2, 2020). The food and beverage sector experienced a sharp 7.75% decline (p < 0.05) in abnormal returns during the first week following the fraud allegations, stabilizing over the next two months. Upon confirmation of the fraud, the retail food sector demonstrated a strong positive reaction, with returns increasing by 17.45% (p < 0.01) in the first week and continuing to rise in the following months. In contrast, the food and beverage sector saw only temporary gains, with no significant movement thereafter. Other sectors, such as technology and finance, displayed considerable volatility and delayed responses to the scandal. These findings highlight the externalities of financial fraud, illustrating its disruptive effect on market behavior across industries. The results underscore the need for more robust corporate governance, enhanced regulatory oversight, and targeted behavioral interventions to mitigate fraud risk and restore investor confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.19461
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Externalities of Financial Fraud: Competitor Reaction and Cross-Sectoral Impact of the Luckin Coffee Scandal

Lisha Xu
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
article

Externalities of Financial Fraud: Competitor Reaction and Cross-Sectoral Impact of the Luckin Coffee Scandal

Lisha Xu
article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the Luckin Coffee financial fraud scandal on abnormal stock returns across related and unrelated industries. Using a Difference- in-Differences (DID) methodology, this study examines market reactions to two key events: the initial fraud allegations in the Muddy Waters report (January 31, 2020) and Luckin Coffees admission of fraudulent activities (April 2, 2020). The food and beverage sector experienced a sharp 7.75% decline (p < 0.05) in abnormal returns during the first week following the fraud allegations, stabilizing over the next two months. Upon confirmation of the fraud, the retail food sector demonstrated a strong positive reaction, with returns increasing by 17.45% (p < 0.01) in the first week and continuing to rise in the following months. In contrast, the food and beverage sector saw only temporary gains, with no significant movement thereafter. Other sectors, such as technology and finance, displayed considerable volatility and delayed responses to the scandal. These findings highlight the externalities of financial fraud, illustrating its disruptive effect on market behavior across industries. The results underscore the need for more robust corporate governance, enhanced regulatory oversight, and targeted behavioral interventions to mitigate fraud risk and restore investor confidence.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 139(1)
New York University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.