Comparative Analysis of ESG-Focused DeFi Protocols and Traditional ESG Funds: Financial Performance, Transparency, and Impact Assessment

The intersection of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing and decentralized finance (DeFi) introduces innovative pathways for integrating sustainability into financial markets. This study conducts a comparative analysis of ESG-focused DeFi protocols, such as KlimaDAO and Regen Network, and traditional ESG investment funds, including the Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF and BlackRock Sustainable Advantage Large Cap Core Fund. Using data from March 2021 to March 2023 and quantitative methods such as ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, the study evaluates financial performance, transparency, and impact assessment. Results indicate that ESG-focused DeFi protocols provide enhanced transparency and potential for higher returns but are hindered by greater volatility and regulatory uncertainty. Conversely, traditional ESG funds offer stability and robust governance frameworks but lack the real-time transparency inherent to DeFi platforms. The findings underscore the need for standardized ESG reporting and offer actionable insights for investors aiming to align sustainability goals with financial performance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35629/5252-0612482494
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of ESG-Focused DeFi Protocols and Traditional ESG Funds: Financial Performance, Transparency, and Impact Assessment

Jude Enajero
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

Comparative Analysis of ESG-Focused DeFi Protocols and Traditional ESG Funds: Financial Performance, Transparency, and Impact Assessment

Jude Enajero
article en

Abstract

The intersection of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing and decentralized finance (DeFi) introduces innovative pathways for integrating sustainability into financial markets. This study conducts a comparative analysis of ESG-focused DeFi protocols, such as KlimaDAO and Regen Network, and traditional ESG investment funds, including the Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF and BlackRock Sustainable Advantage Large Cap Core Fund. Using data from March 2021 to March 2023 and quantitative methods such as ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, the study evaluates financial performance, transparency, and impact assessment. Results indicate that ESG-focused DeFi protocols provide enhanced transparency and potential for higher returns but are hindered by greater volatility and regulatory uncertainty. Conversely, traditional ESG funds offer stability and robust governance frameworks but lack the real-time transparency inherent to DeFi platforms. The findings underscore the need for standardized ESG reporting and offer actionable insights for investors aiming to align sustainability goals with financial performance

International Journal of Advances in Engineering and ManagementVol. 06(12)
Baylor University (US), Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of ESG-Focused DeFi Protocols and Traditional ESG Funds: Financial Performance, Transparency, and Impact Assessment — Jude Enajero · International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS