How to Apologize for Hate and Hate Speech in the Light of Law and Civil Proceedings

The article addresses the issue of enforcing a court judgment that obligates the perpetrator of hate speech to apologize to the victim (make a statement of appropriate content and in the appropriate form in accordance with Article 24 1 of the Civil Code). The study considers the current legal status, determined primarily by amendments to Articles 1049 and 1050 of the Civil Procedure Code and Article 480 of the Civil Code. The author presents existing opinions on the execution of such judgments (always as a substitutable act, always as a non-substitutable act, sometimes as a substitutable act, sometimes as a non-substitutable act, or as a declaration of will) along with their critical analysis and the current legal status (including doubts related to the correct understanding of the applicable provisions) and points out the shortcomings of the amendments. The criticism mainly concerns the severity of the sanctions that realistically threaten a person violating someone's personal rights through hate speech and the place of compulsory publication of apologies (Court and Economic Monitor - MSiG).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9406
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Apologize for Hate and Hate Speech in the Light of Law and Civil Proceedings

Robert Słabuszewski
Studia Administracji i Bezpieczeństwa
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

How to Apologize for Hate and Hate Speech in the Light of Law and Civil Proceedings

Robert Słabuszewski
article en

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of enforcing a court judgment that obligates the perpetrator of hate speech to apologize to the victim (make a statement of appropriate content and in the appropriate form in accordance with Article 24 1 of the Civil Code). The study considers the current legal status, determined primarily by amendments to Articles 1049 and 1050 of the Civil Procedure Code and Article 480 of the Civil Code. The author presents existing opinions on the execution of such judgments (always as a substitutable act, always as a non-substitutable act, sometimes as a substitutable act, sometimes as a non-substitutable act, or as a declaration of will) along with their critical analysis and the current legal status (including doubts related to the correct understanding of the applicable provisions) and points out the shortcomings of the amendments. The criticism mainly concerns the severity of the sanctions that realistically threaten a person violating someone's personal rights through hate speech and the place of compulsory publication of apologies (Court and Economic Monitor - MSiG).

Studia Administracji i BezpieczeństwaVol. 17(17)
The Jacob of Paradies University (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.