Ratio of Potential and Real Victims as a Victimological Problem

The article examines the ratio of potential and real victims as a victimological problem .The author of the article highlights two sides of the problem: the first is related to the methodology for determining the criteria for potential victims and real victims; the second is associated with a direct objective transition from the number of potential victims to the number of real victims .In the context of the first side (related to the methodology for determining the criteria of potential victims and real victims), the author of the article points to the pluralism of opinions, summarizes diverse scientific and official doctrines and notes the corresponding range of criteria: the circle of potential victims is considered within the framework of the positions from “a person may suffer as a result of committing crime” to “any person”, the range of real victims is considered within the framework of positions from “a person is officially recognized as a victim of an act with signs of a crime” to “a person has suffered from an act with signs of a crime, regardless of the official recognition of the status” .In the context of the second side (associated with a direct objective transition from the number of potential victims to the number of real victims) the author of the article notes: the connection of the problem with priority attention not to a dangerous act or event, which is not always formally criminal, but to a crime as a formally qualified act in this way; the specificity and complexity of the process of victimization and its understanding .To solve the first part of the problem, the author of the article suggests: primary attention should be focused not on a crime, but on a dangerous act or event, including a possible one; application of the criterion “in the field of regulatory legal regulation” or similar .To solve the second part of the problem, the author of the article suggests: the structural-victimological aspect should become part of all criminological research, analysis and assessment of all acts, events, incidents; introduction and expansion of the used victimological indicators and other means of studying the consequences of dangerous acts, events, incidents, and their victims themselves

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Victimology
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47475/2411-0590-2024-11-3-392-405
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ratio of Potential and Real Victims as a Victimological Problem

Vadim I. Rezyuk
Victimology
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Ratio of Potential and Real Victims as a Victimological Problem

Vadim I. Rezyuk
article en

Abstract

The article examines the ratio of potential and real victims as a victimological problem .The author of the article highlights two sides of the problem: the first is related to the methodology for determining the criteria for potential victims and real victims; the second is associated with a direct objective transition from the number of potential victims to the number of real victims .In the context of the first side (related to the methodology for determining the criteria of potential victims and real victims), the author of the article points to the pluralism of opinions, summarizes diverse scientific and official doctrines and notes the corresponding range of criteria: the circle of potential victims is considered within the framework of the positions from “a person may suffer as a result of committing crime” to “any person”, the range of real victims is considered within the framework of positions from “a person is officially recognized as a victim of an act with signs of a crime” to “a person has suffered from an act with signs of a crime, regardless of the official recognition of the status” .In the context of the second side (associated with a direct objective transition from the number of potential victims to the number of real victims) the author of the article notes: the connection of the problem with priority attention not to a dangerous act or event, which is not always formally criminal, but to a crime as a formally qualified act in this way; the specificity and complexity of the process of victimization and its understanding .To solve the first part of the problem, the author of the article suggests: primary attention should be focused not on a crime, but on a dangerous act or event, including a possible one; application of the criterion “in the field of regulatory legal regulation” or similar .To solve the second part of the problem, the author of the article suggests: the structural-victimological aspect should become part of all criminological research, analysis and assessment of all acts, events, incidents; introduction and expansion of the used victimological indicators and other means of studying the consequences of dangerous acts, events, incidents, and their victims themselves

VictimologyVol. 11(3)
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.