Improving Test Reviews With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Abstract: The purpose of evaluating psychological and educational tests and disseminating test review reports is to enhance the use of tests and professional practice. There are several test review protocols and models in various countries designed to assess the quality of commercial tests, but non-commercialized tests are still yet to be evaluated thoroughly. This study indicates significant progress in test evaluations with systematic reviewing and meta-analyses, focusing on tests published in scientific journals and other channels. Our approach combines test review protocols, such as the Spanish model, with systematic reviewing and meta-analyses to evaluate non-commercial tests, such as the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale-2. We explore the advantages of this integrated approach and propose modifications to the test review protocol to accommodate the unique characteristics of noncommercial tests. This document also discusses the differences between international and national reviews, highlighting the importance of local norms from a practitioner’s perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000880
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Test Reviews With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Ana Hernández, Francisco J. Abad, Paula Elosua
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

Improving Test Reviews With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Ana Hernández, Francisco J. Abad, Paula Elosua
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of evaluating psychological and educational tests and disseminating test review reports is to enhance the use of tests and professional practice. There are several test review protocols and models in various countries designed to assess the quality of commercial tests, but non-commercialized tests are still yet to be evaluated thoroughly. This study indicates significant progress in test evaluations with systematic reviewing and meta-analyses, focusing on tests published in scientific journals and other channels. Our approach combines test review protocols, such as the Spanish model, with systematic reviewing and meta-analyses to evaluate non-commercial tests, such as the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale-2. We explore the advantages of this integrated approach and propose modifications to the test review protocol to accommodate the unique characteristics of noncommercial tests. This document also discusses the differences between international and national reviews, highlighting the importance of local norms from a practitioner’s perspective.

European Journal of Psychological AssessmentVol. 40(6)
Universitat de València (ES), University of the Basque Country (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.