The Importance of Sexual History-Taking Within Surgery

Sexual and reproductive health is an essential part of comprehensive medical care. As the field of medicine becomes more specialized and siloed and the diagnostic workup in surgery more advanced, the risk of anchoring diagnoses and partitioning of care increases. Thus, the fundamentals of a complete patient history and review of each body system remain critical in ensuring that surgeons establish a broad differential diagnosis; provide comprehensive, well-rounded care to patients; and create opportunities for patient counseling and interventions. The article by Coleman and colleagues reports on an intervention that did not result in trainees being more likely to take a sexual history; however, the intervention group did ask significantly more questions regarding sexual health than the comparison group when they did take a sexual history. They highlight that there is a persistent gap in sexual history-taking, and that this results in potential misdiagnoses as well as missed opportunities to counsel patients about sexual and reproductive health. Clinicians have a responsibility to recognize factors that increase risk for their patients and provide appropriate counseling, which they cannot do if they are not asking all the necessary questions, even the difficult ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Medicine
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000005965
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Sexual History-Taking Within Surgery

Mary T. Hawn, Justine Chinn
1 citations
Academic Medicine
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
0.54
article

The Importance of Sexual History-Taking Within Surgery

Mary T. Hawn, Justine Chinn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Sexual and reproductive health is an essential part of comprehensive medical care. As the field of medicine becomes more specialized and siloed and the diagnostic workup in surgery more advanced, the risk of anchoring diagnoses and partitioning of care increases. Thus, the fundamentals of a complete patient history and review of each body system remain critical in ensuring that surgeons establish a broad differential diagnosis; provide comprehensive, well-rounded care to patients; and create opportunities for patient counseling and interventions. The article by Coleman and colleagues reports on an intervention that did not result in trainees being more likely to take a sexual history; however, the intervention group did ask significantly more questions regarding sexual health than the comparison group when they did take a sexual history. They highlight that there is a persistent gap in sexual history-taking, and that this results in potential misdiagnoses as well as missed opportunities to counsel patients about sexual and reproductive health. Clinicians have a responsibility to recognize factors that increase risk for their patients and provide appropriate counseling, which they cannot do if they are not asking all the necessary questions, even the difficult ones.

Academic MedicineVol. 100(4)
Palo Alto University (US), TCL (China) (CN), Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Importance of Sexual History-Taking Within Surgery — Mary T. Hawn, Justine Chinn · Academic Medicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS