Procedural practice effects in remote digital memory assessment
Practice effects were present, indicating that procedural practice benefited task scores, despite non-repeating stimuli. The MDT-OS group x practice interaction indicated that participants in the burst design group had lower scores at their initial MDT-OS visit, but increased performance with practice at a higher rate. No main effects or interaction of amyloid result was observed, possibly due to limited availability of data and few elevated participants.
Authors
- Emrah Düzel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-5388)
- David Berron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1558-1883)
- Kristin E Basche (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-8507)
- Amanda L. Peterson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7872-0874)
- Hannah L. Rosario
- Lindsay R. Clark (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-7627)
- Sterling C. Johnson
Institutions
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (US)
- Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE)
- University Hospital Magdeburg (DE)
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (US)
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Alzheimer s & Dementia
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091794
- Primary Topic
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00