Memorial Justice? Lessons from Colombia on How Memorialization Can Serve Justice in Transitional Contexts

ABSTRACT The first Restorative Sanctions (Sanciones Propias) proposed by the Colombian Special Jurisdiction for Peace – globally acknowledged for its innovative sanctioning model – include memorial initiatives that should serve to punish the perpetrators of massive human rights violations and contribute to restoring the damages caused during the armed conflict. While in previous transitional processes, memory had a role as a complement, an alternative or a means to achieve justice in the future, through the Special Jurisdiction for Peace, memory could play a role as judicial punishment for those most responsible for massive atrocities. This article explores the gap opened up by this new dimension for memory through a transdisciplinary qualitative case study. It examines how and whether memorialization can serve the interests of justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Transitional Justice
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijae046
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Memorial Justice? Lessons from Colombia on How Memorialization Can Serve Justice in Transitional Contexts

Carlos Arturo Gutiérrez Rodríguez
2 citations
International Journal of Transitional Justice
Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
2.26
article

Memorial Justice? Lessons from Colombia on How Memorialization Can Serve Justice in Transitional Contexts

Carlos Arturo Gutiérrez Rodríguez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The first Restorative Sanctions (Sanciones Propias) proposed by the Colombian Special Jurisdiction for Peace – globally acknowledged for its innovative sanctioning model – include memorial initiatives that should serve to punish the perpetrators of massive human rights violations and contribute to restoring the damages caused during the armed conflict. While in previous transitional processes, memory had a role as a complement, an alternative or a means to achieve justice in the future, through the Special Jurisdiction for Peace, memory could play a role as judicial punishment for those most responsible for massive atrocities. This article explores the gap opened up by this new dimension for memory through a transdisciplinary qualitative case study. It examines how and whether memorialization can serve the interests of justice.

International Journal of Transitional JusticeVol. 19(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.